Morales v. Walgreen Co.
| Alfred Morales |
| Walgreen Co. |
| 4:2019cv00085 |
| January 7, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Sallie Kim |
| Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers |
| Labor: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 20
ORDER VACATING HEARING. The Court VACATES the hearing re #15 MOTION to Remand filed by Alfred Morales, currently set for 3/5/2019. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 2/28/19. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/28/2019)
|
| Filing 19 REPLY in Support of (re #15 MOTION to Remand ) filed byAlfred Morales. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Edward J. Wynne In Support of Motion to Remand; Exhibits 1-2, #2 Declaration of Alfred Morales In Support of Motion to Remand, #3 Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendant's Request for Judicial Notice)(Wynne, Edward) (Filed on 2/12/2019) Modified on 2/13/2019 (cpS, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 18 Request for Judicial Notice re #17 Opposition/Response to Motion filed byWalgreen Co.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Caves Complaint)(Related document(s) #17 ) (Archibald, Christopher) (Filed on 2/5/2019) |
| Filing 17 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #15 MOTION to Remand ) filed byWalgreen Co.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Alicia Musgrove, #2 Declaration Christopher J. Archibald)(Archibald, Christopher) (Filed on 2/5/2019) |
| Filing 16 CLERK'S NOTICE SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Case Management Statement due by 4/8/2019. Initial Case Management Conference set for MONDAY, 4/15/2019 02:00 PM before Judge Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in Oakland, Courtroom 1, 4th Floor. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order) (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/22/2019) |
| Filing 15 MOTION to Remand; Memorandum of Points and Authorities In Support filed by Alfred Morales. Motion Hearing set for 3/5/2019 02:00 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 1, 4th Floor before Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. Responses due by 2/5/2019. Replies due by 2/12/2019. (Wynne, Edward) (Filed on 1/22/2019) Modified on 1/23/2019 (cpS, COURT STAFF). |
| REMINDER: Counsel are instructed that all future filings shall bear the initials YGR immediately after the case number pursuant to the order reassigning case (document #12 ). In the future, please be sure that the case number is correctly reflected on your documents as 4:19-cv-00085-YGR Re: #14 Notice filed by Walgreen Co. (cpS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/22/2019) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Pendency of Other Action or Proceeding by Walgreen Co. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Eckstrom, Allison) (Filed on 1/18/2019) Modified on 1/22/2019 (cpS, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Change In Counsel by Ray Edwin Gallo (Gallo, Ray) (Filed on 1/11/2019) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim no longer assigned to the case. This case is assigned to a judge who participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Signed by Executive Committee on 1/11/19. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(as, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/11/2019)
|
| Filing 11 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (mklS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/10/2019) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE by Walgreen Co. re #8 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines,, (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Order Setting Initial Case Management Conference and ADR Deadlines, #2 Exhibit Consenting to a Magistrate Judge's Jurisdiction Brochure, #3 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Archibald, Christopher) (Filed on 1/10/2019) |
| Filing 9 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Alfred Morales.. (Gallo, Ray) (Filed on 1/10/2019) |
| Filing 8 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: This case may fall within the Pilot Program for Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action. See #General Order 71. Parties and Counsel are directed to review General Order 71 to determine whether it applies to this case, and to comply with that General Order if applicable. Joint Case Management Statement due by 4/1/2019. Initial Case Management Conference set for 4/8/2019 at 1:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom C, 15th Floor. (tnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/8/2019) |
| Answer to Plaintiff's Class Action Complaint (Removal Complaint) filed by Walgreen Co.. (tnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/7/19) |
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Walgreen Co. of re #4 Certificate of Interested Entities, re #2 Declaration in Support, re 6 Case Assigned by Intake, re #1 Notice of Removal, re #3 Declaration in Support, re #5 Certificate of Interested Entities and other Orders and Required Documents (Archibald, Christopher) (Filed on 1/7/2019) |
| Filing 6 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 1/22/2019. (srnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/7/2019) |
| Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1 filed by Walgreen Co. identifying Corporate Parent Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. for Walgreen Co. re #1 Notice of Removal (Archibald, Christopher) (Filed on 1/7/2019) |
| Filing 4 Certification of Interested Entities or Persons Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 3-15 filed by Walgreen Co. identifying Corporate Parent Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. for Walgreen Co. re #1 Notice of Removal (Archibald, Christopher) (Filed on 1/7/2019) |
| Filing 3 Declaration of Alicia Musgrove in Support of #1 Notice of Removal filed by Walgreen Co.. (Related document(s) #1 ) (Archibald, Christopher) (Filed on 1/7/2019) |
| Filing 2 Declaration of Amelia Legutki in Support of #1 Notice of Removal filed by Walgreen Co.. (Related document(s) #1 ) (Archibald, Christopher) (Filed on 1/7/2019) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (Class Action Fairness Act Jurisdiction) from San Francisco County Superior Court. Their case number is CGC- 18-570597, (Filing Fee: $400.00, receipt number 0971-12978338). Filed by Walgreen Co.. (Attachments: #(1) Civil Cover Sheet)(Archibald, Christopher) (Filed on 1/7/2019) Modified on 1/8/2019 (tnS, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
