Doggie Dental, Inc. v. Shahid
Doggie Dental, Inc. |
Imran Shahid and Imran Shahid individually and doing business as Puppy Pal, an unknown business entity doing business as Puppy Pal |
4:2019cv01705 |
April 2, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Kandis A Westmore |
Copyright |
17 U.S.C. ยง 101 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 CLERK'S NOTICE. You are hereby notified that the Initial Case Management Conference set for 7/9/2019 is continued to 8/27/2019 at 1:30 pm. A case management statement is due by 8/20/2019. In light of the continuance, the Motion to Appear by Telephone is deemed moot. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (dtmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/26/2019) |
Filing 10 MOTION to Appear by Telephone at Initial Case Management Conference filed by Doggie Dental, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Carlson, Roy) (Filed on 6/25/2019) |
Filing 9 ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options filed by Plaintiff Doggie Dental Inc. (Carlson, Roy) (Filed on 6/3/2019) |
Filing 8 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Doggie Dental, Inc... (Carlson, Roy) (Filed on 4/16/2019) |
Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Imran Shahid. (jjbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/4/2019) |
Filing 6 Proposed Summons. (Carlson, Roy) (Filed on 4/3/2019) |
Filing 5 REPORT on the filing or determination of an action regarding Copyrights (cc: form mailed to register). (Attachments: #1 Complaint)(jjbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/3/2019) |
#Electronic filing error. Defendant's name and address section was incomplete on the proposed summons. This filing will not be processed by the clerks office.Please re-file a corrected prosed summons in its entirety. Re: #2 Proposed Summons filed by Doggie Dental, Inc. (jjbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/3/2019) Modified on 4/3/2019 (jjbS, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 7/2/2019. Initial Case Management Conference set for 7/9/2019 01:30 PM. (jjbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/2/2019) |
Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 4/16/2019. (srnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/2/2019) |
Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Carlson, Roy) (Filed on 4/2/2019) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-13224555.). Filed byDoggie Dental, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Civil Cover Sheet)(Carlson, Roy) (Filed on 4/2/2019) Modified on 4/3/2019 (jjbS, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.