City of Roseville Employees' Retirement System v. Apple Inc. et al

Plaintiff: City of Roseville Employees' Retirement System
Defendant: Apple Inc., Luca Maestri and Timothy D. Cook
Case Number: 4:2019cv02033
Filed: April 16, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers
Nature of Suit: Securities/Commodities
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 16, 2019 Filing 5 Civil Cover Sheet by City of Roseville Employees' Retirement System . (Williams, Shawn) (Filed on 4/16/2019)
April 16, 2019 #Electronic filing error. Case has been randomly assigned to judge. However, incorrect Civil Cover Sheet used at case opening of JS-CAND 44 (Rev. 08/18). Complete correct Civil Cov er Sheet of JS-CAND 44 (Rev 06/17) and re-file in its entirety as a separate docket entry re : #1 Complaint, filed by City of Roseville Employees' Retirement System (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/16/2019)
April 16, 2019 Filing 4 Case assigned to Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/16/2019)
April 16, 2019 Filing 3 Certificate of Interested Entities by City of Roseville Employees' Retirement System (Williams, Shawn) (Filed on 4/16/2019)
April 16, 2019 Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Williams, Shawn) (Filed on 4/16/2019)
April 16, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Violations of the Federal Securities Laws against Apple Inc., Timothy D. Cook, Luca Maestri ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-13264437.). Filed byCity of Roseville Employees' Retirement System. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Williams, Shawn) (Filed on 4/16/2019)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: City of Roseville Employees' Retirement System v. Apple Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Apple Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Luca Maestri
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Timothy D. Cook
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: City of Roseville Employees' Retirement System
Represented By: Shawn A. Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?