United States of America v. BTC-e et al
United States of America |
BTC-e, Alexander Vinnik and Canton Business Corporation |
4:2019cv04281 |
July 25, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Kandis A Westmore |
Forfeit/Penalty: Other |
31 U.S.C. § 3545 Action to Recovery Money |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 28 ORDER re #27 Status Report filed by United States of America Signed by Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 1/18/2022. Status Report due by 4/18/2022. (wft, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/18/2022) |
Filing 27 STATUS REPORT and Proposed Order by United States of America. (Iyengar, Savith) (Filed on 1/14/2022) |
Filing 26 ORDER re #25 Status Report filed by United States of America Status Report due by 1/17/2022. Signed by Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 10/21/2021. (amgS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/21/2021) |
Filing 25 STATUS REPORT and Proposed Order by United States of America. (Iyengar, Savith) (Filed on 10/18/2021) |
Filing 24 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by United States of America (Certificate of Transmission for Service on BTC-e, a/k/a Canton Business Corp., and Alexander Vinnik) (Iyengar, Savith) (Filed on 8/5/2021) |
Filing 23 ORDER re #22 Status Report. Signed by Judge KANDIS A. WESTMORE on 7/23/21. Joint Status Report due by 10/18/2021. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/23/2021) |
Filing 22 STATUS REPORT and Proposed Order by United States of America. (Iyengar, Savith) (Filed on 7/19/2021) |
Filing 21 ORDER re #20 Status Report. Status Report due by 7/19/2021. Signed by Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 4/22/21. (dtmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/22/2021) |
Filing 20 STATUS REPORT and Proposed Order by United States of America. (Iyengar, Savith) (Filed on 4/20/2021) |
Filing 19 ORDER re #18 Status Report. Status Report due by 4/20/2021. Signed by Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 2/24/21. (dtmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/24/2021) |
Filing 18 STATUS REPORT AND PROPOSED ORDER by United States of America. (Iyengar, Savith) (Filed on 2/19/2021) |
Filing 17 ORDER re #16 Status Report filed by United States of America. Status Report due by 2/19/2021. Signed by Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 1/7/21. (dtmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/7/2021) |
Filing 16 STATUS REPORT and Proposed Order by United States of America. (Iyengar, Savith) (Filed on 12/21/2020) |
Filing 15 ORDER re #14 : Plaintiff United States of America shall file a Status Report by 12/21/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 10/22/2020. (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/22/2020) |
Filing 14 STATUS REPORT and Proposed Order by United States of America. (Iyengar, Savith) (Filed on 10/21/2020) |
Filing 13 CLERK'S NOTICE. Plaintiff shall file a Status Report by 10/21/2020. For future reference, Plaintiff shall submit a proposed order in accordance with L.R. 5-1(g). (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (dtmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/23/2020) |
Filing 12 STATUS REPORT by United States of America. (Iyengar, Savith) (Filed on 7/22/2020) |
Filing 11 CLERK'S NOTICE. Plaintiff shall file a Status Report by 7/23/2020. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (dtmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/27/2020) |
Filing 10 STATUS REPORT by United States of America. (Iyengar, Savith) (Filed on 4/24/2020) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Substitution of Counsel by Savith Iyengar (Iyengar, Savith) (Filed on 4/24/2020) |
Filing 8 CLERK'S NOTICE: Plaintiff shall file a Status Report no later than 3/6/2020. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (dtmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/12/2020) |
Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by United States of America.. (Ault, Kirstin) (Filed on 8/13/2019) |
Filing 6 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiff shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 8/26/2019. (dtmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/12/2019) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to BTC-e, Alexander Vinnik. (jjbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/26/2019) |
Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 8/8/2019. (ajsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/25/2019) |
Filing 3 Proposed Summons. (Ault, Kirstin) (Filed on 7/25/2019) |
Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Ault, Kirstin) (Filed on 7/25/2019) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against BTC-e, Alexander Vinnik. Filed byUnited States of America. (Exempt from Filing Fee) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Ault, Kirstin) (Filed on 7/25/2019) Modified on 7/25/2019 (ajsS, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.