Uribe et al v. Ford Motor Credit Company LLC
| Alma Uribe and Arcadia Gallardo |
| Ford Motor Credit Company LLC |
| 4:2020cv04666 |
| July 13, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Jon S Tigar |
| Kandis A Westmore |
| Consumer Credit |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Ford Motor Credit Company LLC. Filed byArcadia Gallardo, Alma Uribe. (Kemnitzer, Kristin) (Filed on 9/3/2020) |
Filing 15
Order Granting Leave to File First Amended Complaint by Judge Jon S. Tigar granting #14 Stipulation. Amended Pleadings due by 9/2/2020.(mllS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/28/2020)
|
| Filing 14 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Granting Leave to File First Amended Complaint filed by Arcadia Gallardo, Alma Uribe and Ford Motor Credit Company LLC. (Kemnitzer, Kristin) (Filed on 8/26/2020) Modified on 8/27/2020 (jmlS, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 13 STIPULATION to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint re #5 Stipulation filed by Ford Motor Credit Company LLC and Alma Uribe and Arcadia Gallardo. (Kemp, Erik) (Filed on 8/19/2020) Modified on 8/20/2020 (jmlS, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 12 CLERK'S NOTICE SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Case Management Statement due by 10/20/2020. Initial Case Management Conference set for 10/27/2020 02:00 PM. (mllS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/29/2020) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Jon S. Tigar for all further proceedings. Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong no longer assigned to case. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras.Signed by Clerk on 7/28/2020. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(jmlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/28/2020)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER OF RECUSAL. All pending dates are hereby vacated and are to be reset by the newly assigned Judge. Signed by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong on 7/28/2020. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/28/2020)
|
|
Filing 9
CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER FOR REASSIGNED CIVIL CASE: Initial Case Management Conference by Telephone is set for 10/21/2020 02:45 PM. Case Management Statement due by 10/14/2020. Signed by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong on 7/28/2020. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order)(fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/28/2020)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore no longer assigned to case. Signed by Clerk on 7/28/2020. (jmlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/28/2020)
|
| Filing 7 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (dtmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/27/2020) |
| Filing 6 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Arcadia Gallardo, Alma Uribe.. (Kemnitzer, Kristin) (Filed on 7/27/2020) |
| Filing 5 STIPULATION re #1 Notice of Removal, to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint filed by Ford Motor Credit Company LLC, Alma Uribe, and Arcadia Gallardo. (Kemp, Erik) (Filed on 7/20/2020) Modified on 7/21/2020 (ajsS, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 10/6/2020. Initial Case Management Conference set for 10/13/2020 01:30 PM. (ajsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/14/2020) |
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 7/27/2020. (mbcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/13/2020) |
| Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet by Ford Motor Credit Company LLC . (Kemp, Erik) (Filed on 7/13/2020) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL TO FEDERAL COURT UNDER THE CLASS ACTION FAIRNESS ACT [28 U.S.C. 1332(d), 1453(b)] from Alameda County Superior Court. Their case number is RG20063364. (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0971-14685197). Filed byFord Motor Credit Company LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Kemp, Erik) (Filed on 7/13/2020) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
