BioSpyder Technologies, Inc. v. HTG Molecular Diagnostics, Inc.
| BioSpyder Technologies, Inc. |
| HTG Molecular Diagostics, Inc. and HTG Molecular Diagnostics, Inc. |
| 5:2020cv05607 |
| August 12, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Edward J Davila |
| Susan van Keulen |
| Patent |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1338 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 ANSWER TO COUNTERCLAIM PLAINTIFF'S ANSWER TO DEFENDANT'S COUNTERCLAIM byBioSpyder Technologies, Inc.. (Mack, Joshua) (Filed on 9/29/2020) |
| Filing 17 Refund Status re #16 Application for Refund Approved. (rghS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/24/2020) |
| Filing 16 Application for Refund, Receipt Number 0971-14807344 and 0971-14807526 by BioSpyder Technologies, Inc.. (Carsten, Douglas) (Filed on 9/21/2020) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance by Ryan L. Frei (Frei, Ryan) (Filed on 9/11/2020) |
| Filing 14 Certificate of Interested Entities by HTG Molecular Diagnostics, Inc. (Davis, Scott) (Filed on 9/8/2020) |
| Filing 13 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand , COUNTERCLAIM for Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 8,741,564 against BioSpyder Technologies, Inc. byHTG Molecular Diagnostics, Inc.. (Davis, Scott) (Filed on 9/8/2020) |
| Filing 12 (Text Only) CLERKS NOTICE RESETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE FOLLOWING REASSIGNMENT. Joint Case Management Statement due by 11/23/2020. Initial Case Management Conference set for 12/3/2020 10:00 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 4, 5th Floor before Hon. Edward J. Davila. The Court does not issue a revised Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines. Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ejdorders. This is a text only docket entry, there is no document associated with this notice. (amkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/26/2020) |
Filing 11
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Edward J. Davila for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore no longer assigned to case, Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Signed by The Clerk on 8/26/2020. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(anjS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/26/2020)
|
| Filing 10 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (dtmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/26/2020) |
| Filing 9 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by BioSpyder Technologies, Inc... (Mack, Joshua) (Filed on 8/26/2020) |
| Filing 8 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by BioSpyder Technologies, Inc. (Mack, Joshua) (Filed on 8/18/2020) |
| Filing 7 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 11/3/2020. Initial Case Management Conference set for 11/10/2020 01:30 PM. Please check online calendar for courtroom assignment. (bnsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/13/2020) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to HTG Molecular Diagnostics, Inc. (ecgS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/13/2020) |
| Filing 5 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 8/27/2020. (haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/13/2020) |
| Filing 4 Rule 7.1 Disclosures by BioSpyder Technologies, Inc. and Certificate of Interested Entities or Persons (Carsten, Douglas) (Filed on 8/12/2020) |
| Filing 3 REPORT on the filing or determination of an action regarding patent (cc: form mailed to register). (Carsten, Douglas) (Filed on 8/12/2020) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Carsten, Douglas) (Filed on 8/12/2020) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT OF NONINFRINGEMENT against HTG Molecular Diagnostics, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-14807579.). Filed byBioSpyder Technologies, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Civil Cover Sheet)(Carsten, Douglas) (Filed on 8/12/2020) Modified on 8/13/2020 (bnsS, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
