Charles v. Target Corporation
Plaintiff: Cheryl Charles
Defendant: Target Corporation
Case Number: 4:2020cv07854
Filed: November 6, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Jacqueline Scott Corley
Referring Judge: Haywood S Gilliam
2 Judge: Kandis A Westmore
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 31, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 89 Mail sent to Charles returned as undeliverable re #88 Order Dismissing Case. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/31/2022)
October 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 88 CONDITIONAL ORDER OF DISMISSAL Re Docket NO. #87 . Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 10/25/2022. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/25/2022)
October 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 87 STATUS REPORT (JOINT) RE SETTLEMENT AND ANTICIPATED DATE FOR STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND REQUEST TO VACATE TRIAL AND OTHER DATES by Target Corporation. (Livingston, Renee) (Filed on 10/24/2022)
October 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 86 ORDER by Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. DIRECTING the parties to file by 5:00 p.m. on October 24, 2022, a joint status report of no more than two pages notifying the Court when they will file a stipulation of dismissal in light of the successful mediation held on October 20, 2022. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (hsglc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/24/2022)
October 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 85 Certification of ADR Session by Mediator Tamara Lange: I hereby certify that the parties in this matter held a Mediation session on October 20, 2022. The case settled. Mediation is complete. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (af, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/21/2022)
October 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Set Hearings as to Docket Nos. #75 - #77 , See Docket No. #80 : Motion Hearing set for 11/8/2022 03:00 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 2, 4th Floor before Judge Haywood S. Gilliam Jr. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/18/2022)
October 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 84 MOTION in Limine No. 4 to Preclude Speculative Opinion Testimony of Plaintiff's Expert Zachary Moore filed by Target Corporation. Motion Hearing set for 11/8/2022 03:00 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 2, 4th Floor before Judge Haywood S Gilliam Jr.. Responses due by 10/24/2022. (Attachments: #1 MIL No. 4, #2 Declaration, #3 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Livingston, Renee) (Filed on 10/18/2022)
October 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 83 MOTION in Limine No. 3 re Exclusion of Evidence of the Billed Amount of Medical Services filed by Target Corporation. Motion Hearing set for 11/8/2022 03:00 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 2, 4th Floor before Judge Haywood S Gilliam Jr.. Responses due by 10/24/2022. (Attachments: #1 Mil No. 3, #2 Declaration, #3 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Livingston, Renee) (Filed on 10/18/2022)
October 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 82 MOTION in Limine No. 2 re Reference in Guest Incident Report regarding Baby Powder filed by Target Corporation. Motion Hearing set for 11/8/2022 03:00 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 2, 4th Floor before Judge Haywood S Gilliam Jr.. Responses due by 10/24/2022. (Attachments: #1 MIL No. 2, #2 Declaration, #3 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Livingston, Renee) (Filed on 10/18/2022)
October 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 81 MOTION in Limine No. 1 re Alleged Statement of Target Corporation Employee filed by Target Corporation. Motion Hearing set for 11/8/2022 03:00 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 2, 4th Floor before Judge Haywood S Gilliam Jr.. Responses due by 10/24/2022. (Attachments: #1 MIL No. 1, #2 Declaration, #3 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Livingston, Renee) (Filed on 10/18/2022)
October 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 80 Renotice motion hearing re #77 MOTION in Limine NO. 3 RE: PLAINTIFFS COUNSEL BEING BASED IN LOS ANGELES, #76 MOTION in Limine NO. 2 RE: PLAINTIFF BEING ON DISABILITY, #75 MOTION in Limine NO. 1 RE: EXCLUSION OF UNDISCLOSED WITNESSES filed byCheryl Charles. (Related document(s) #77 , #76 , #75 ) (Taylor, Matthew) (Filed on 10/18/2022)
October 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 79 JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT filed by Cheryl Charles. (Taylor, Matthew) (Filed on 10/18/2022)
October 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 78 CLERK'S NOTICE. Notice is hereby given that counsel must notice the ( #75 - #77 ) motions in limine for hearing. Hearing date of November 8, 2022, is vacated and will be reset once formally noticed for hearing date. The briefing schedule remains in effect. The motions should not be re-filed. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/18/2022)
October 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 77 MOTION in Limine NO. 3 RE: PLAINTIFFS COUNSEL BEING BASED IN LOS ANGELES filed by Cheryl Charles. Motion Hearing set for 11/8/2022 03:00 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 2, 4th Floor before Judge Haywood S Gilliam Jr.. Responses due by 10/25/2022. (Taylor, Matthew) (Filed on 10/18/2022)
October 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 76 MOTION in Limine NO. 2 RE: PLAINTIFF BEING ON DISABILITY filed by Cheryl Charles. Motion Hearing set for 11/8/2022 03:00 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 2, 4th Floor before Judge Haywood S Gilliam Jr.. Responses due by 10/25/2022. (Taylor, Matthew) (Filed on 10/18/2022)
October 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 75 MOTION in Limine NO. 1 RE: EXCLUSION OF UNDISCLOSED WITNESSES filed by Cheryl Charles. Motion Hearing set for 11/8/2022 03:00 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 2, 4th Floor before Judge Haywood S Gilliam Jr.. Responses due by 10/25/2022. (Taylor, Matthew) (Filed on 10/18/2022)
October 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 74 ORDER DENYING #63 MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT.Case Management Statement due by 10/18/2022 and Further Case Management Conference set for 10/25/2022 02:00 PM. The 10/25 proceeding will be held by AT&T Conference Line. The parties are advised that in the event of an audio problem, counsel should be prepared to attend the hearing via Zoom conference at the Courts direction. The court circulates the following conference number to allow the equivalent of a public hearing by telephone.For conference line information, see: https://apps.cand.uscourts.gov/telhrg/ All counsel, members of the public and press please use the following dial-in information below to access the conference line: Dial In: 888-808-6929Access Code: 6064255The Court may be in session with proceedings in progress when you connect to the conference line. Therefore, mute your phone if possible and wait for the Court to address you before speaking on the line. For call clarity, parties shall NOT use speaker phone or earpieces for these calls, and where at all possible, parties shall use landlines. The parties are further advised to ensure that the Court can hear and understand them clearly before speaking at length.PLEASE NOTE: Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited. See General Order 58 at Paragraph III. Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 10/6/2022. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/6/2022)
September 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 73 ORDER by Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. CONTINUING the deadline to complete mediation to October 31, 2022. This terminates Dkt. No. 70. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (hsglc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/21/2022)
September 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 72 ADR Clerk's Notice VACATING MEDIATOR PERRY A. IRVINE (ECF #60 ) AND APPOINTMENT OF MEDIATOR TAMARA LANGE. (cmf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/21/2022)
September 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 71 ADR Remark: ADR Phone Conference held on 9/21/2022 by Tamara Lange. (cmf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/21/2022) (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.)
September 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Set/Reset Hearing Plaintiff-only pre-mediation caucus set for 10/19/2022 at 10:00 AM. Defense-only pre-mediation caucus set for 10/19/2022 at 11:30 AM. Joint Mediation Hearing set for 10/20/2022 at 10:00 AM. (cmf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/21/2022)
September 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 70 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER TO REQUEST NEW NEUTRAL AND TO EXTEND ADR COMPLETION DUE DATE filed by Cheryl Charles. (Taylor, Matthew) (Filed on 9/20/2022)
September 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 69 ADR Clerk's Notice Setting ADR Phone Conference on Wednesday, September 21, 2022, at 9:30 AM Pacific time. Please note that you must be logged into an ECF account of counsel of record in order to view this document. (af, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/16/2022)
August 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 68 CLERK'S NOTICE. Notice is hereby given that the Court takes the pending #63 motion for summary judgment filings under submission. The hearing previously scheduled for August 11, 2022 at 2:00 p.m. is vacated. The Court will issue a written order. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/9/2022)
July 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 67 REPLY (re #63 First MOTION for Summary Judgment or Alternatively, Partial Summary Judgment ) filed byTarget Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Declaration FURTHER DECLARATION OF RENE WELZE LIVINGSTON IN SUPPORT OF MOTION OF TARGET CORPORATION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR ALTERNATIVELY, PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT)(Livingston, Renee) (Filed on 7/28/2022)
July 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 66 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #63 First MOTION for Summary Judgment or Alternatively, Partial Summary Judgment ) filed byCheryl Charles. (Attachments: #1 Declaration DECLARATION OF MATTHEW TAYLOR IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFS OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT TARGET CORPORATION S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT)(Taylor, Matthew) (Filed on 7/21/2022)
July 14, 2022 Opinion or Order #Electronic filing error. Document not properly linked. [err102]Corrected by Clerk's Office. No further action is necessary. Re: #65 Exhibits, filed by Target Corporation (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/14/2022)
July 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 65 EXHIBITS E AND F TO #49 -1 Declaration of Rene Weize Livingston IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT TARGET CORPORATIONS OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR ISSUE AND/OR EVIDENTIARY SANCTIONS AGAINST DEFENDANT FOR SPOLIATION OF EVIDENCE filed by Target Corporation. (Livingston, Renee) (Filed on 7/13/2022) Modified on 7/14/2022 (cv, COURT STAFF).
July 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 64 CLERK'S NOTICE RE DOCKET NO. #63 : The Judge's name is Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. In the future, the signature line of all proposed orders submitted should include Jr. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (bns, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/8/2022)
July 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 63 First MOTION for Summary Judgment or Alternatively, Partial Summary Judgment filed by Target Corporation. Motion Hearing set for 8/11/2022 02:00 PM before Judge Haywood S Gilliam Jr.. Responses due by 7/21/2022. Replies due by 7/28/2022. (Attachments: #1 MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF MOTION OF TARGET CORPORATION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, ALTERNATIVELY, PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT, #2 DECLARATION OF RENE WELZE LIVINGSTON IN SUPPORT OF MOTION OF TARGET CORPORATION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, ALTERNATIVELY, PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT, #3 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE IN SUPPORT OF MOTION OF TARGET CORPORATION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, ALTERNATIVELY, PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT, #4 [PROPOSED] ORDER #5 certificate of service Livingston, Renee) (Filed on 7/7/2022) Modified on 7/14/2022 (cv, COURT STAFF).
July 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 62 ORDER DENYING #42 MOTION FOR SANCTIONS AND GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART #50 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SEAL by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. (bns, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/6/2022)
June 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 61 CLERK'S NOTICE. Notice is hereby given that the Court takes the pending #42 motion for sanctions filings under submission. The hearing previously scheduled for June 30, 2022 at 2:00 p.m. is vacated. The Court will issue a written order. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/29/2022)
June 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 60 ADR Clerk's Notice Appointing Perry A. Irvine as Mediator. (af, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/7/2022)
May 31, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 59 ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting #57 Stipulation TO EXTEND DATE COMPLETION OF EXPERT DISCOVERY. Close of Expert Discovery due by 6/24/2022. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/31/2022)
May 31, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 58 CLERK'S NOTICE TO COUNSEL RE DOCKET NO. #57 . The Judge's first name is Haywood not Hayward. In the future, the signature line of all proposed orders submitted should correctly reflect his name as Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/31/2022)
May 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 57 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND DATE COMPLETION OF EXPERT DISCOVERY filed by Target Corporation. (Livingston, Renee) (Filed on 5/27/2022)
May 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 55 ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting #54 Stipulation Selecting Mediation. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/20/2022)
May 20, 2022 Opinion or Order CASE REFERRED to Mediation. (af, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/20/2022)
May 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 54 STIPULATION and Proposed Order selecting Mediation by Cheryl Charles filed by Cheryl Charles. (Taylor, Matthew) (Filed on 5/19/2022)
May 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 56 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.: Telephonic Further Case Management Conference held on 5/17/2022.Total Time in Court: 7 Minutes. Not Reported. Plaintiff Attorney: Matthew Taylor. Defendant Attorney: Renee Livingston. Court-connected mediation is discussed. Parties are directed to meet and confer and e-file a stipulation and proposed order selecting an ADR process. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Date Filed: 5/17/2022)
May 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 53 CLERK'S NOTICE SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE RE DOCKET NO. #52 .Notice is hereby given that a Case Management Conference has been set for May 17, 2022, before Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr., at 2:00 p.m. The May 17th proceeding will be held by AT&T Conference Line. The parties are advised that in the event of an audio problem, counsel should be prepared to attend the hearing via Zoom conference at the Courts direction. The court circulates the following conference number to allow the equivalent of a public hearing by telephone.For conference line information, see: https://apps.cand.uscourts.gov/telhrg/ All counsel, members of the public and press please use the following dial-in information below to access the conference line: Dial In: 888-808-6929Access Code: 6064255The Court may be in session with proceedings in progress when you connect to the conference line. Therefore, mute your phone if possible and wait for the Court to address you before speaking on the line. For call clarity, parties shall NOT use speaker phone or earpieces for these calls, and where at all possible, parties shall use landlines. The parties are further advised to ensure that the Court can hear and understand them clearly before speaking at length.PLEASE NOTE: Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited. See General Order 58 at Paragraph III. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.)(ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/16/2022)
May 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 52 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER RE: ADR REFERRAL filed by Cheryl Charles. (Taylor, Matthew) (Filed on 5/13/2022)
April 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 51 REPLY (re #42 MOTION for Sanctions ) PLAINTIFFS REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR ISSUE AND/OR EVIDENTIARY SANCTIONS AGAINST DEFENDANT FOR SPOLIATION OF EVIDENCE filed byCheryl Charles. (Taylor, Matthew) (Filed on 4/8/2022)
March 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 50 First Administrative Motion to File Under Seal PROTECTED MATERIAL UNDER STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER filed by Target Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Exhibit Exhibit E, #3 Exhibit Exhibit F, #4 Exhibit Exhibit G, #5 Proposed Order, #6 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Livingston, Renee) (Filed on 3/25/2022)
March 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 49 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #42 MOTION for Sanctions ) TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ISSUE AND/OR EVIDENTIARY SANCTIONS AGAINST DEFENDANT FOR SPOLIATION OF EVIDENCE filed byTarget Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Proposed Order)(Livingston, Renee) (Filed on 3/25/2022)
March 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Reset Deadlines as to Docket No. #42 MOTION for Sanctions, Re Docket No. 48 . Reply due by 4/8/2022. (bns, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/8/2022)
March 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 48 ORDER by Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. GRANTING Dkt. No. #46 Plaintiff's administrative motion to enlarge time to reply to motion for sanctions. Plaintiff shall file any reply brief in support of her motion for sanctions by April 8, 2022. The Court has serious concerns that counsel are not working together effectively on this matter, and that they are wasting party and Court resources as a result. Neither this administrative motion nor Dkt. No. #44 the previous administrative motion to enlarge time should have been necessary. The parties could have readily agreed to a schedule that was agreeable to both sides and filed a single stipulation. The Court cautions the parties that they are expected to work together professionally and to move this case forward efficiently. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (hsglc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/7/2022)
March 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 47 CLERK'S NOTICE RE #46 Administrative Motion. Notice is hereby given that the briefing set by counsel is reset as follows pursuant to Local Rule 7-11(b): Response is due by March 8, 2022. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (bns, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/7/2022)
March 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 46 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION to enlarge the time to Reply to any Opposition to Plaintiffs Motion for Issue and/or Evidentiary Sanctions and Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Another Partys Documents Should Be Sealed re #42 MOTION for Sanctions filed by Cheryl Charles. Responses due by 4/1/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Taylor, Matthew) (Filed on 3/4/2022)
March 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 45 ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting #44 Administrative Motion TO ENLARGE TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTION FOR ISSUE AND/OR EVIDENTIARY SANCTIONS AND ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER ANOTHER PARTYS DOCUMENTS SHOULD BE SEALED (DOC #42 ). (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/4/2022)
March 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Reset Deadlines as to #42 MOTION for Sanctions, See Docket No. #45 : Responses due by 3/25/2022 and Replies due by 4/1/2022. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/4/2022)
March 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 44 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION ENLARGE TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTION FOR ISSUE AND/OR EVIDENTIARY SANCTIONS AND ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER ANOTHER PARTYS DOCUMENTS SHOULD BE SEALED (DOC 42) filed by Target Corporation. Responses due by 3/7/2022. (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Livingston, Renee) (Filed on 3/3/2022)
February 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 43 Brief re #42 MOTION for Sanctions PROOF OF SERVICE FOR ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION filed byCheryl Charles. (Related document(s) #42 ) (Taylor, Matthew) (Filed on 2/25/2022)
February 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 42 MOTION for Sanctions filed by Cheryl Charles. Motion Hearing set for 6/30/2022 02:00 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 2, 4th Floor before Judge Haywood S Gilliam Jr.. Responses due by 3/11/2022. Replies due by 3/18/2022. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR ISSUE AND/OR EVIDENTIARY SANCTIONS AGAINST DEFENDANT FOR SPOLIATION OF EVIDENCE, #2 PLAINTIFFS ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER ANOTHER PARTYS MATERIALS SHOULD BE SEALED; DECLARATION OF MATTHEW TAYLOR IN SUPPORT THEREOF)(Taylor, Matthew) (Filed on 2/25/2022)
January 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 41 ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting #40 Stipulation Re NEW TRIAL DATE. Close of Fact Discovery due by 3/28/2022; Opening Reports due by 4/27/2022; Rebuttal Reports due by 5/18/2022; Close of Expert Discovery due by 6/16/2022; Motion Hearing set for 8/11/2022 02:00 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 2, 4th Floor before Judge Haywood S. Gilliam Jr.; Pretrial Conference set for 11/8/2022 03:00 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 2, 4th Floor before Judge Haywood S. Gilliam Jr.; and Jury Selection / Jury Trial set for 11/28/2022 08:30 AM in Oakland, Courtroom 2, 4th Floor before Judge Haywood S. Gilliam Jr. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/10/2022)
January 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 40 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re NEW TRIAL DATE filed by Target Corporation. (Livingston, Renee) (Filed on 1/7/2022)
November 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 39 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.: Telephonic Further Case Management Conference held on 11/30/2021.Total Time in Court: 10 minutes. Not Reported. Plaintiff Attorney: Aaron Miller. Defendant Attorney: Renee Livingston. The Court orders the parties to meet and confer and e-file by January 7, 2022 a stipulation and proposed order setting a case schedule including dispositive motion hearing, pre-trial conference, and trial dates. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Date Filed: 11/30/2021)
October 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 38 ORDER by Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Although the Court vacated the current case schedule during the October 5 case management conference, the Court did not vacate any currently scheduled depositions. Accordingly, the parties should still proceed with the defense deposition on October 29 as previously scheduled. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (hsglc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/7/2021)
October 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 37 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.: Telephonic Further Case Management Conference held on 10/5/2021.Total Time in Court: 10 minutes. Not Reported. Plaintiff Attorney: Aaron Miller. Defendant Attorney: Renee Livingston. The Court vacates the case schedule in its entirety. Parties are directed to address their dispute regarding the sequencing of the depositions of Plaintiff and Defendants PMK with the assigned discovery Magistrate Judge if necessary. The Court sets a further case management conference for November 30, 2021 at 2 p.m. This proceeding will be held by AT&T Conference Line. The parties are advised that in the event of an audio problem, counsel should be prepared to attend the hearing via Zoom conference at the Courts direction. The court circulates the following conference number to allow the equivalent of a public hearing by telephone.For conference line information, see: https://apps.cand.uscourts.gov/telhrg/ All counsel, members of the public and press please use the following dial-in information below to access the conference line: Dial In: 888-808-6929Access Code: 6064255The Court may be in session with proceedings in progress when you connect to the conference line. Therefore, mute your phone if possible and wait for the Court to address you before speaking on the line. For call clarity, parties shall NOT use speaker phone or earpieces for these calls, and where at all possible, parties shall use landlines. The parties are further advised to ensure that the Court can hear and understand them clearly before speaking at length.PLEASE NOTE: Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited. See General Order 58 at Paragraph III. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Date Filed: 10/5/2021)
October 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 36 NOTICE of Appearance by Matthew Morgan Taylor APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL (Taylor, Matthew) (Filed on 10/5/2021)
September 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 35 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.: Telephone Conference held on 9/23/2021.Total Time in Court: 25 Minutes. Not Reported. Plaintiff Attorney: Matthew Taylor. Defendant Attorney: Renee Livingston. The Court advises the parties that it is not inclined to continue the trial date. However, in light of the current circumstances the Court will hold the fact and expert discovery deadlines in abeyance. The Court directs the parties to take any defendant depositions as soon as possible. The parties are further directed to consider how the case schedule may be adjusted moving forward to accommodate discovery without affecting the trial date. Matter is continued to October 5, 2021 at 2p.m. for a telephonic further case management conference. The October 5th proceeding will be held by AT&T Conference Line. The parties are advised that in the event of an audio problem, counsel should be prepared to attend the hearing via Zoom conference at the Courts direction. The court circulates the following conference number to allow the equivalent of a public hearing by telephone.For conference line information, see: https://apps.cand.uscourts.gov/telhrg/ All counsel, members of the public and press please use the following dial-in information below to access the conference line: Dial In: 888-808-6929Access Code: 6064255The Court may be in session with proceedings in progress when you connect to the conference line. Therefore, mute your phone if possible and wait for the Court to address you before speaking on the line. For call clarity, parties shall NOT use speaker phone or earpieces for these calls, and where at all possible, parties shall use landlines. The parties are further advised to ensure that the Court can hear and understand them clearly before speaking at length.PLEASE NOTE: Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited. See General Order 58 at Paragraph III. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Date Filed: 9/23/2021)
September 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 34 CLERK'S NOTICE SETTING TELEPHONIC CONFERENCE. Notice is hereby given that a Telephonic Conference has been set for September 23, 2021, before Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr., at 1:00 p.m. This proceeding will be held by AT&T Conference Line. The parties are advised that in the event of an audio problem, counsel should be prepared to attend the hearing via Zoom conference at the Courts direction. The court circulates the following conference number to allow the equivalent of a public hearing by telephone.For conference line information, see: https://apps.cand.uscourts.gov/telhrg/ All counsel, members of the public and press please use the following dial-in information below to access the conference line: Dial In: 888-808-6929Access Code: 6064255The Court may be in session with proceedings in progress when you connect to the conference line. Therefore, mute your phone if possible and wait for the Court to address you before speaking on the line. For call clarity, parties shall NOT use speaker phone or earpieces for these calls, and where at all possible, parties shall use landlines. The parties are further advised to ensure that the Court can hear and understand them clearly before speaking at length.PLEASE NOTE: Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited. See General Order 58 at Paragraph III. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/21/2021)
September 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Denying #32 Stipulation TO CONTINUE TRIAL AND OTHER DEADLINES. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/21/2021)
September 20, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 32 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE TRIAL AND OTHER DEADLINES filed by Cheryl Charles. (Taylor, Matthew) (Filed on 9/20/2021)
August 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 31 ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting #30 Stipulation TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER RE FACT DISCOVERY CUTOFF, EXCHANGE OF OPENING AND REBUTTAL EXPERT REPORTS AND EXPERT DISCOVERY. Close of Fact Discovery due by 8/31/2021; Opening Reports due by 9/15/2021; Rebuttal Reports due by 9/30/2021; and Close of Expert Discovery due by 10/13/2021. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/3/2021)
July 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 30 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER RE FACT DISCOVERY CUTOFF, EXCHANGE OF OPENING AND REBUTTAL EXPERT REPORTS AND EXPERT DISCOVERY filed by Target Corporation and Cheryl Charles. (Livingston, Renee) (Filed on 7/30/2021) Modified on 8/2/2021 (bnsS, COURT STAFF).
June 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER RE: DISCOVERY DISPUTE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on June 23, 2021. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/23/2021)
June 18, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 28 JOINT DISCOVERY DISPUTE LETTER BRIEF(Taylor, Matthew) (Filed on 6/18/2021) Modified on 6/21/2021 (bnsS, COURT STAFF).
June 17, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 27 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley: Informal Discovery Hearing held and recorded by Zoom videoconference on 6/17/2021. The Court cannot order the plaintiff to an in-person deposition for the reasons stated on the record. The parties informed the Court a joint letter brief is forthcoming. (Recording Time 1:45-2:10)Attorney for Plaintiff: Matthew TaylorAttorney for Defendant: Rene Livingston (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Date Filed: 6/17/2021)
June 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 26 CLERK'S NOTICE SETTING INFORMAL DISCOVERY HEARING BY ZOOM. Please take notice an informal discovery hearing is set for June 17, 2021 at 1:30 p.m. before Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley and the proceeding will be held via a Zoom webinar.Webinar Access: All counsel, members of the public, and media may access the webinar information at #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/jsc Court Appea rances: Advanced notice is required of counsel or parties who wish to be identified by the court as making an appearance or will be participating in the argument at the hearing. A list of names must be sent to the CRD at jsccrd@cand.uscourts.gov no later than 12:00 p.m. on June 16, 2021.General Order 58. Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited.Zoom Guidance and Setup: #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/zoom/. (This is a text -only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ahmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/14/2021)
June 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 25 SCHEDULING ORDER RE: MOTION TO COMPEL SITE INSPECTION, AND FOR SANCTIONS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 6/10/2021. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/10/2021)
June 8, 2021 Opinion or Order CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley for Discovery (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/8/2021)
June 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge for Discovery purposes Re Docket No. #23 . Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 6/8/2021. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/8/2021)
June 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 23 MOTION to Compel SITE INSPECTION, AND FOR SANCTIONS filed by Cheryl Charles. Motion Hearing set for 8/26/2021 02:00 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 2, 4th Floor before Judge Haywood S Gilliam Jr.. Responses due by 6/22/2021. Replies due by 6/29/2021. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order FOR PLAINTIFF CHERYL CHARLES NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO COMPEL SITE INSPECTION, AND FOR SANCTIONS)(Taylor, Matthew) (Filed on 6/8/2021) Modified on 6/9/2021 (bnsS, COURT STAFF).
June 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 22 CLERK'S NOTICE. Notice is hereby given that counsel must re-notice not re- file the #21 motion to compel. Hearing date of August 19, 2021, is vacated. The briefing schedule remains in effect. Counsel is directed to check the Court's scheduling notes before re-noticing the motion for a new hearing date. August 19th was not the Court's next available hearing date when this motion was e-filed. If counsel would like to request an earlier date, an administrative motion or a stipulation and proposed order should be filed after the motion is re-noticed. And if granted, the Court will advance the hearing date. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/8/2021)
June 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ***Re-filed, See Docket No. #23 .*** MOTION to Compel SITE INSPECTION, AND FOR SANCTIONS filed by Cheryl Charles. Motion Hearing set for 8/19/2021 02:00 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 2, 4th Floor before Judge Haywood S Gilliam Jr.. Responses due by 6/21/2021. Replies due by 6/28/2021. (Attachments: #1 PROPOSED ORDER FOR PLAINTIFF CHERYL CHARLES NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO COMPEL SITE INSPECTION, AND FOR SANCTIONS)(Taylor, Matthew) (Filed on 6/7/2021) Modified on 6/8/2021 (bnsS, COURT STAFF). Modified on 6/8/2021 (ndrS, COURT STAFF).
March 25, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting #19 Proposed Stipulated Protective Order. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/25/2021)
March 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 19 Proposed Stipulated Protective Order filed by Target Corporation, and Cheryl Charles (Livingston, Renee) (Filed on 3/24/2021) Modified on 3/25/2021 (bnsS, COURT STAFF).
February 17, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 18 SCHEDULING ORDER: Amended Pleadings due by 5/3/2021; Close of Fact Discovery due by 7/16/2021; Opening Reports due by 7/30/2021; Rebuttal Reports due by 8/13/2021. Close of Expert Discovery due by 9/3/2021. Motion Hearing set for 11/4/2021 02:00 PM before Judge Haywood S. Gilliam Jr.; Pretrial Conference set for 2/1/2022 03:00 PM before Judge Haywood S. Gilliam Jr.; and Jury Selection /Jury Trial (5-day)set for 2/28/2022 08:30 AM before Judge Haywood S. Gilliam Jr. **This order terminates docket no. #17 .** Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 3/17/2021. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/17/2021)
February 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 17 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED SCHEDULING ORDER re 16 Case Management Conference - Initial, Set Deadlines filed by Target Corporation, and Cheryl Charles. (Livingston, Renee) (Filed on 2/16/2021) Modified on 2/17/2021 (bnsS, COURT STAFF).
February 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 16 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.: Telephonic Initial Case Management Conference held on 2/9/2021. Total Time in Court: 12 Minutes. Not Reported. Plaintiff Attorney: Matthew Taylor. Defendant Attorney: Renee Livingston. The Court is of the view that the case should be tried within approximately one year, with February 21, 2022 as the target trial date. Parties are directed to meet and confer and e-file within one week from today (February 16th) a stipulation and proposed order setting a case schedule shorter than previously proposed. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Date Filed: 2/9/2021)
February 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 15 CLERK'S NOTICE RE DOCKET NO. 11 . Notice is hereby given that the case management conference previously set for February 9, 2021 will be held telephonically. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.). This proceeding will be held by AT&T Conference Line. The court circulates the following conference number to allow the equivalent of a public hearing by telephone.For conference line information, see: https://apps.cand.uscourts.gov/telhrg/ All counsel, members of the public and press please use the following dial-in information below to access the conference line: Dial In: 888-808-6929Access Code: 6064255The Court may be in session with proceedings in progress when you connect to the conference line. Therefore, mute your phone if possible and wait for the Court to address you before speaking on the line. For call clarity, parties shall NOT use speaker phone or earpieces for these calls, and where at all possible, parties shall use landlines. The parties are further advised to ensure that the Court can hear and understand them clearly before speaking at length.PLEASE NOTE: Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited. See General Order 58 at Paragraph III. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/2/2021)
February 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 14 JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT filed by Target Corporation, and Cheryl Charles. (Livingston, Renee) (Filed on 2/1/2021) Modified on 2/2/2021 (bnsS, COURT STAFF).
January 11, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options (Alexandroff, Andrew) (Filed on 1/11/2021)
January 11, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options (Livingston, Renee) (Filed on 1/11/2021)
November 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 11 CLERK'S NOTICE SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE FOR REASSIGNED CIVIL CASE. Notice is hereby given that a Case Management Conference has been set for February 9, 2021, before Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr., at 2:00 p.m. Case Management Statement due by February 2, 2021. Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. All future filings should reflect the case number as 4:20-cv-07854-HSG. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/24/2020)
November 23, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Haywood S Gilliam, Jr for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore no longer assigned to case, Signed by the Clerk on 11/23/2020. (anjS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/23/2020)
November 20, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Cheryl Charles.. (Taylor, Matthew) (Filed on 11/20/2020)
November 20, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Target Corporation of Initial Removal Documents (Livingston, Renee) (Filed on 11/20/2020)
November 20, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (dtmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/20/2020)
November 20, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Target Corporation.. (Livingston, Renee) (Filed on 11/20/2020)
November 20, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Certificate of Interested Entities by Target Corporation identifying Corporate Parent Target Corporation for Target Corporation. (Livingston, Renee) (Filed on 11/20/2020)
November 20, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Cheryl Charles. (Alexandroff, Andrew) (Filed on 11/20/2020)
November 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 2/2/2021. Initial Case Management Conference set for 2/9/2021 01:30 PM. (bnsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/9/2020)
November 9, 2020 Opinion or Order ANSWER to Complaint by Target Corporation. (bnsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/9/2020)
November 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 11/20/2020. (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/6/2020)
November 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PETITION For Removal of Action Pursuant to 28 USC 1441(b) [Diversity]; Demand for Jury Trial against Cheryl Charles (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0971-15164610). Filed byTarget Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Livingston, Renee) (Filed on 11/6/2020)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Charles v. Target Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cheryl Charles
Represented By: Matthew Morgan Taylor
Represented By: Arin Khodaverdian
Represented By: Andrew V Alexandroff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Target Corporation
Represented By: Renee Welze Livingston
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?