Lyft, Inc. v. Quartz Auto Technologies LLC
Plaintiff: Lyft, Inc.
Defendant: Quartz Auto Technologies LLC
Case Number: 4:2021cv01871
Filed: March 17, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Susan van Keulen
Referring Judge: Jon S Tigar
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
RSS RSS Track this Docket
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 23, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 29, 2021 Filing 25 NOTICE by Lyft, Inc. re #24 Order on Administrative Motion to File Under Seal, #15 Amended Complaint, (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A to First Amended Complaint for Declaratory Judgment of Noninfringement Previously Filed Under Seal)(Taylor, Jeremy) (Filed on 4/29/2021)
April 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 24 Order by Judge Jon S. Tigar denying #4 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal.(mllS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/27/2021)
April 23, 2021 Filing 23 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #4 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal ) filed byQuartz Auto Technologies LLC. (Birmingham, Jon) (Filed on 4/23/2021)
April 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER RE: MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL re #4 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal filed by Lyft, Inc. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on April 21, 2021. (mllS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/21/2021)
April 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ******PLEASE DISREGARD. ENTERED IN ERROR.***** Order by Judge Jon S. Tigar granting #4 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal.(mllS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/21/2021) Modified on 4/21/2021 (mllS, COURT STAFF).
April 20, 2021 Filing 20 Certificate of Interested Entities by Quartz Auto Technologies LLC and Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement (Birmingham, Jon) (Filed on 4/20/2021)
April 20, 2021 Filing 19 STIPULATION to Extend Time to Respond to Amended Complaint [L.R. 6-1(a)] filed by Quartz Auto Technologies LLC and Lyft, Inc.. (Birmingham, Jon) (Filed on 4/20/2021) Modified on 4/21/2021 (jmlS, COURT STAFF).
April 13, 2021 Filing 18 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons, First Amended Complaint served on Quartz Auto Technologies LLC c/o Keith Machen on 4/8/2021, filed by Lyft, Inc.. (Taylor, Jeremy) (Filed on 4/13/2021)
April 8, 2021 Filing 17 Summons Issued as to Quartz Auto Technologies LLC. (jmlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/8/2021)
April 7, 2021 Filing 16 Proposed Summons. (Taylor, Jeremy) (Filed on 4/7/2021)
April 6, 2021 Filing 15 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Quartz Auto Technologies LLC. Filed by Lyft, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G)(Taylor, Jeremy) (Filed on 4/6/2021) Modified on 4/6/2021 (jmlS, COURT STAFF).
March 29, 2021 Filing 14 CLERK'S NOTICE SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Case Management Statement due by 6/22/2021. Initial Case Management Conference set for 6/29/2021 02:00 PM in Oakland, - To be determined. (mllS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/29/2021)
March 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Jon S. Tigar for all further proceedings. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen no longer assigned to case. Reassignment Order signed by Clerk on 3/29/2021. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/29/2021)
March 26, 2021 Filing 12 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons, Complaint, Standing Orders served on Quartz Auto Technologies LLC c/o Keith Machen on 3/26/2021, filed by Lyft, Inc.. (Taylor, Jeremy) (Filed on 3/26/2021)
March 26, 2021 Filing 11 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (jhfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/26/2021)
March 26, 2021 Filing 10 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Lyft, Inc... (Taylor, Jeremy) (Filed on 3/26/2021)
March 17, 2021 Filing 9 Summons Issued as to Quartz Auto Technologies LLC. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/17/2021)
March 17, 2021 Filing 8 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 6/8/2021. Initial Case Management Conference set for 6/15/2021 09:30 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 6, 4th Floor. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/17/2021)
March 17, 2021 Filing 7 REPORT on the filing or determination of an action regarding U.S. Patents Nos. 7,007,013; 9,691,275; 6,944,443; 6,847,871 (cc: form mailed to register). (Taylor, Jeremy) (Filed on 3/17/2021)
March 17, 2021 Filing 6 Proposed Summons. (Taylor, Jeremy) (Filed on 3/17/2021)
March 17, 2021 Filing 5 Certificate of Interested Entities by Lyft, Inc. (Taylor, Jeremy) (Filed on 3/17/2021)
March 17, 2021 Filing 4 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal filed by Lyft, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Proposed Order, #3 Unredacted Version of Exhibit A, #4 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Boggs, Elizabeth) (Filed on 3/17/2021) Modified on 4/21/2021 (mllS, COURT STAFF).
March 17, 2021 Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 3/31/2021. (anjS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/17/2021)
March 17, 2021 Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Elizabeth Kathleen Boggs (Boggs, Elizabeth) (Filed on 3/17/2021)
March 17, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Quartz Auto Technologies LLC ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0971-15712197.). Filed byLyft, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Civil Cover Sheet)(Taylor, Jeremy) (Filed on 3/17/2021)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lyft, Inc. v. Quartz Auto Technologies LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lyft, Inc.
Represented By: Elizabeth Kathleen Boggs
Represented By: Jeremy J Taylor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Quartz Auto Technologies LLC
Represented By: Jon A Birmingham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?