Franklin v. Weisler et al
| Scott Franklin |
| HP Inc., Carl Bass, Margaret C. Whitman, Charles Bergh, Rajiv L Gupta, ROBERT R. BENNETT, Shumeet Banerji, Catherine A. Lesjak, Stacy Brown-Philpot, Stacey Mobley, Tracy Keogh, Aida Alvarez, Dion J. Weisler, Stephanie A. Burns, Subra Suresh, Enrique Lores and Mary Anne Citrino |
| 4:2021cv04805 |
| June 23, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Jeffrey S White |
| Securities/Commodities |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER by Judge Jeffrey S. White granting #8 Stipulation TO STAY. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/1/2021)
|
| Filing 8 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER TO STAY filed by Aida Alvarez, ROBERT R. BENNETT, Shumeet Banerji, Carl Bass, Charles Bergh, Stacy Brown-Philpot, Stephanie A. Burns, Mary Anne Citrino, Rajiv L Gupta, HP Inc., Tracy Keogh, Catherine A. Lesjak, Enrique Lores, Stacey Mobley, Subra Suresh, Dion J. Weisler, Margaret C. Whitman and Scott Franklin. (Lutz, Brian) (Filed on 6/30/2021) Modified on 7/1/2021 (anjS, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 7 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 9/24/2021. Initial Case Management Conference set for 10/1/2021 11:00 AM in Oakland, Courtroom 5, 2nd Floor. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(ecgS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/24/2021) |
| Filing 6 Case assigned to Judge Jeffrey S. White. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. (haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/24/2021) |
| Filing 5 Case transferred in from District of Delaware; Case Number 1:21-cv-00703. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
|
Filing 4
SO ORDERED, Granting #3 Joint Stipulation and Proposed Order Regarding Transfer of Action. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 6/22/2021. (nms)
|
| Filing 3 STIPULATION and [Proposed] Order Regarding Transfer of Action by Scott Franklin. (Ernst, Ryan) |
| Case transferred to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. (nms) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Richard G. Andrews. Please include the initials of the Judge (RGA) after the case number on all documents filed. (nms) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (mal) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed against Aida Alvarez, Shumeet Banerji, Carl Bass, Robert R. Bennett, Charles Bergh, Stacy Brown-Philpot, Stephanie A. Burns, Mary Anne Citrino, Rajiv L. Gupta, Tracy Keogh, Catherine A. Lesjak, Enrique Lores, Stacey Mobley, Subra Suresh, Dion J. Weisler, Margaret C. Whitman - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ADEDC-3617194.) - filed by Scott Franklin. (Attachments: #1 Verification, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(mal) |
| No Summons Issued. (mal) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
