Scott et al v. Whiting
| Randall Scott and Shannon Scott |
| Mark Whiting |
| 4:2021cv06057 |
| August 5, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Phyllis J Hamilton |
| Sallie Kim |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 23 U.S.C. § 134 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 Acknowledgement of Receipt from San Francisco Superior Court. (gbaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/23/2021) |
| Filing 17 Mailed certified copies to SF Superior Court. (hdjS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/16/2021) |
Filing 16
Order GRANTING #14 Motion to Remand. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on September 15, 2021. (pjhlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/15/2021)
|
| Filing 15 Notice of Non-Opposition (re #14 MOTION to Remand) filed by Mark Whiting. (Painter, Charles) (Filed on 9/7/2021) Modified on 9/7/2021 (gbaS, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 14 MOTION to Remand filed by Randall Scott, Shannon Scott. Motion Hearing set for 10/7/2021 01:30 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 3, 3rd Floor before Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton. Responses due by 9/7/2021. Replies due by 9/14/2021. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Remand to Superior Court)(Ojeda, Daniel) (Filed on 8/24/2021) |
|
Filing 13
ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Joint Case Management Statement due by 12/9/2021. Initial Case Management Conference set for 12/16/2021 at 02:00 - Videoconference Only. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 8/24/2021. (kcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/24/2021)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim no longer assigned to case,. Signed by The Clerk on 8/24/21. (haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/24/2021)
|
| Filing 11 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (mklS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/23/2021) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Change In Counsel by Daniel Ojeda (Ojeda, Daniel) (Filed on 8/20/2021) |
| Filing 9 Certificate of Interested Entities by Randall Scott, Shannon Scott (Ojeda, Daniel) (Filed on 8/20/2021) |
| Filing 8 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Mark Whiting.. (Painter, Charles) (Filed on 8/19/2021) |
| Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Randall Scott, Shannon Scott.. (Ojeda, Daniel) (Filed on 8/19/2021) |
| Filing 6 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 11/1/2021. Initial Case Management Conference set for 11/8/2021 01:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom C, 15th Floor. (gbaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/6/2021) |
| Answer to Removed Complaint (See Doc No. #1 -page 21) byMark Whiting. (gbaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/5/2021) |
| Filing 5 Second Amended Civil Cover Sheet by Mark Whiting. (Painter, Charles) (Filed on 8/5/2021) Modified on 8/6/2021 (gbaS, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 4 First Amended Civil Cover Sheet by Mark Whiting. (Painter, Charles) (Filed on 8/5/2021) Modified on 8/6/2021 (gbaS, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 8/19/2021. (asS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/5/2021) |
| Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet by Mark Whiting . (Painter, Charles) (Filed on 8/5/2021) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL of Civil Action to the United States District Court from San Francisco County Superior Court. Their case number is CGC-21-592653. (Filing fee $402.00, receipt number 0971-16255228). Filed by Mark Whiting. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Notice of Interested Parties) (Painter, Charles) (Filed on 8/5/2021) Modified on 8/6/2021 (gbaS, COURT STAFF). |
| Please refile the civil cover sheet and mark a nature of suit #Electronic filing error. Civil Cover Sheet missing. No judge assignment will be made until the document is e-filed. S ubmit your document using Civil Events > Other Filings > Other Documents > Civil Cover SheetThis filing will not be processed by the clerks office. Re: #1 Notice of Removal, filed by Mark Whiting (asS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/5/2021) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
