Moore v. Whirlpool Corporation et al
| Emily Moore |
| Whirlpool Corporation, Matrix Absence Management Inc., Whirlpool Corporation Group Benefit Plan and Welfare Benefits Committee of the Whirlpool Corporation Group Benefit Plan |
| 3:2021cv07039 |
| September 10, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Joseph C Spero |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Emily Moore. Service waived by Matrix Absence Management Inc. waiver sent on 9/14/2021, answer due 11/15/2021. (Scott, Kirsten) (Filed on 10/4/2021) |
| Filing 10 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Emily Moore.. (Scott, Kirsten) (Filed on 9/24/2021) |
| Filing 9 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Emily Moore. Service waived by Whirlpool Corporation waiver sent on 9/14/2021, answer due 11/15/2021. (Scott, Kirsten) (Filed on 9/24/2021) |
| Filing 8 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Emily Moore. Service waived by Welfare Benefits Committee waiver sent on 9/14/2021, answer due 11/15/2021. (Scott, Kirsten) (Filed on 9/24/2021) Modified on 9/24/2021 (mclS, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Emily Moore. Service waived by Welfare Benefits Committee of the Whirlpool Corporation Group Benefit Plan waiver sent on 9/14/2021, answer due 11/15/2021. (Scott, Kirsten) (Filed on 9/24/2021) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Matrix Absence Management Inc., Welfare Benefits Committee of the Whirlpool Corporation Group Benefit Plan, Whirlpool Corporation, Whirlpool Corporation Group Benefit Plan. (mclS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/13/2021) |
| Filing 5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 12/10/2021. Initial Case Management Conference set for 12/17/2021 02:00 PM. (mclS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/13/2021) |
| Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 9/27/2021. (mbcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/13/2021) |
| Filing 3 Proposed Summons. (Scott, Kirsten) (Filed on 9/10/2021) |
| Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet by Emily Moore . (Scott, Kirsten) (Filed on 9/10/2021) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Matrix Absence Management Inc., Welfare Benefits Committee of the Whirlpool Corporation Group Benefit Plan, Whirlpool Corporation, Whirlpool Corporation Group Benefit Plan ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0971-16379616.). Filed byEmily Moore. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F)(Scott, Kirsten) (Filed on 9/10/2021) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
