Munoz v. Gipson et al
| Abraham Dionicio Munoz |
| Connie Gipson, Ralph Diaz, Clark Kelso, Cristian Pfeiffer, A. Geary, T. Yonder, C. Gutierrez, S. Swaim, James Robertson, Bill Woods, Vaught, Afadho, Walker Baker, Van Horn, Whiteman, Diehl, Nassar, Colson, Runge, Lofton, Trimm, Sanchez, Dimmick, Little and Andruid |
| 4:2021cv07176 |
| September 16, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Laurel Beeler |
| PSLC CHC |
| Jon S Tigar |
| Prisoner: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Per Plaintiff's request (Dkt. 9) mailed Plaintiff copy of docket sheet. (aea, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/25/2021)
|
|
Filing 9
Letter from Plaintiff regarding In Forma Pauperis filing. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(msrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/21/2021)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Jon S. Tigar for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler no longer assigned to case, Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras.. Signed by Clerk on 10/01/2021. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(mbcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/4/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
|
Filing 7
CLERK'S NOTICE of Impending Reassignment to U.S. District Judge. (ejkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/1/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
|
Filing 6
CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Abraham Dionicio Munoz.. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (gbaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/29/2021)
|
|
Filing 5
Prison Trust Fund Account Statement by Abraham Dionicio Munoz. (gbaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/29/2021)
|
|
Copies of #3 Clerk's Notice and #4 Notice of Assignment mailed to plaintiff. (gbaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/17/2021)
|
|
Filing 4
Notice of Assignment of Prisoner Case to Magistrate Judge. (gbaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/16/2021) Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
|
Filing 3
CLERK'S NOTICE: re completion of In Forma Pauperis affidavit or payment of filing fee due within 28 days. IFP Form due by 10/25/2021. (gbaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/16/2021) Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
|
Filing 2
Declaration of Abraham Munoz in Support of #1 Complaint, filed by Abraham Dionicio Munoz. (Related document(s) #1 ) (gbaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/16/2021)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT Under the Prisoner Civil Rights Act against Afadho, Andruid, Walker Baker, Colson, Ralph Diaz, Diehl, Dimmick, A. Geary, Connie Gipson, C. Gutierrez, Van Horn, Clark Kelso, Little, Lofton, Nassar, Cristian Pfeiffer, James Robertson, Runge, Sanchez, S. Swaim, Trimm, Vaught, Whiteman, Bill Woods, T. Yonder (Filing fee IFPP.). Filed by Abraham Dionicio Munoz. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 Envelope) (gbaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/16/2021)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
