Doe v. Parker-Hannifin Corporation
Plaintiff: John Doe
Defendant: Parker-Hannifin Corporation
Case Number: 4:2022cv03235
Filed: June 2, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers
Nature of Suit: Personal Property: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Property
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 13, 2022 Filing 11 Remark: Case transferred from California Northern has been opened in Northern District of Ohio as case 1:22-cv-01229, filed 07/13/2022 (ark, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/13/2022)
July 12, 2022 Filing 10 Remark: Emailed ECFhelpdesk to transfer case to ND/OH (ark, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/12/2022)
July 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers Granting #8 STIPULATION FOR TRANSFER OF VENUE OF ACTION PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. SECTION 1404. (amg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/11/2022)
July 1, 2022 Filing 8 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER for Transfer of Venue of Action Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1404 filed by John Doe. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Mansfield, Alan) (Filed on 7/1/2022)
July 1, 2022 Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by John Doe. Parker-Hannifin Corporation served on 6/9/2022, answer due 6/30/2022. (Mansfield, Alan) (Filed on 7/1/2022)
June 7, 2022 Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Parker-Hannifin Corporation. (ark, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/7/2022)
June 2, 2022 Filing 5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 9/5/2022. Initial Case Management Conference set for 9/12/2022 02:00 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 1, 4th Floor. (kmg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/2/2022)
June 2, 2022 Filing 4 Civil Cover Sheet by John Doe Amended. (Mansfield, Alan) (Filed on 6/2/2022)
June 2, 2022 Filing 3 Case assigned to Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. (as, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/2/2022)
June 2, 2022 Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Mansfield, Alan) (Filed on 6/2/2022)
June 2, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Parker-Hannifin Corporation ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACANDC-17231381.). Filed byJohn Doe. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Mansfield, Alan) (Filed on 6/2/2022)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Doe v. Parker-Hannifin Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John Doe
Represented By: Alan M. Mansfield
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Parker-Hannifin Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?