Ormerod v. Barton et al
| Judith Ormerod |
| Richard Barton, Rodolphe Belmer, Mathias Dopfner, Timothy Haley, Reed Hastings, David Hyman, Jay Hoag, Leslie Kilgore, Strive Masiyiwa, Spencer Neumann, Gary Peters, Ted Sarandos, Brad Smith, Anne Sweeney, Ann Mather and Netflix, Inc. |
| 4:2022cv04700 |
| August 16, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Sallie Kim |
| Jon S Tigar |
| Stockholders Suits |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Stockholders Suits |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
Order Consolidating Shareholder Derivative Actions and Setting Schedule. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on September 22, 2022. (mll, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/22/2022)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Jon S. Tigar for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim no longer assigned to case. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Signed by The Clerk on 09/22/2022. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(jrs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/22/2022)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER RELATING CASE. Motions terminated: (17 in 4:22-cv-04134-JST) MOTION to Relate Case Defendants' Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Cases Should Be Related Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 3-12 filed by Leslie Kilgore, Mathias DPFNER, Ted Sarandos, Anne Sweeney, Netflix, Inc., Gregory Peters, Brad Smith, Ann Mather, Jay Hoag, Strive Masiyiwa, David Hyman, Richard Barton, Rodolphe Belmer, Reed Hastings, Spencer Neumann, Timothy Haley. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on September 22, 2022. (mll, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/22/2022)
|
| Filing 4 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiff shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge by 9/23/2022. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 9/23/2022. (mkl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/9/2022) |
| Filing 3 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Joint Case Management Statement due by 11/7/2022. Initial Case Management Conference set for 11/14/2022 at 1:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom C, 15th Floor. (tn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/16/2022) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 8/30/2022. (as, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/16/2022) |
| Filing 1 VERIFIED SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL against All Defendants, (Filing Fee: $402.00, receipt number ACANDC-17447312). Filed by Judith Ormerod. (Attachments: #(1) Civil Cover Sheet)(Dean, Lauren) (Filed on 8/16/2022) Modified on 8/16/2022 (tn, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
