Threshold Enterprises Ltd. v. Lifeforce Digital Inc.
Threshold Enterprises Ltd. |
Lifeforce Digital Inc. |
4:2022cv06483 |
October 25, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Haywood S Gilliam |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act) |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 45 SCHEDULING ORDER. *This order terminates docket no. #43 .* Amended Pleadings due by 7/28/2023; Close of Fact Discovery due by 1/5/2024; Opening Reports due by 1/19/2024; Rebuttal Reports due by 2/23/2024; Close of Expert Discovery due by 3/15/2024; Motions due by 3/29/2024; Motion Hearing set for 6/13/2024 02:00 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 2, 4th Floor before Judge Haywood S. Gilliam Jr.; Pretrial Conference set for 9/10/2024 03:00 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 2, 4th Floor before Judge Haywood S. Gilliam Jr.; and Jury Selection / Jury Trial (5-day) set for 9/23/2024 08:30 AM in Oakland, Courtroom 2, 4th Floor before Judge Haywood S. Gilliam Jr. Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 6/1/2023. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/1/2023) |
Filing 44 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand byLifeforce Digital Inc.. (Spatz, George) (Filed on 5/25/2023) |
Filing 43 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER filed by Lifeforce Digital Inc.. (Spatz, George) (Filed on 5/23/2023) |
Filing 42 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.: Motion Hearing and Initial Case Management Conference held on 5/11/2023. Total Time in Court: 22 Minutes. Court Reporter: Pamela Batalo-Hebel . Plaintiff Attorney: Monty Agarwal. Defendant Attorney: Manon Burns and George Spatz appearing via the AT&T conference line. Motion to dismiss (docket no. #16 ) is argued and submitted by the parties and is DENIED in its entirety by the Court. Parties are directed to meet and confer and e-file a stipulation and proposed order setting a case schedule. The stipulation and proposed order should include a mid-summer 2024 trial date (September 2024 at the latest). (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Date Filed: 5/11/2023) Modified on 5/12/2023 to add court reporter (ndr, COURT STAFF). |
This proceeding will be held by AT&T Conference Line for George Spatz Only. The court circulates the following conference number to allow the equivalent of a public hearing by telephone.For conference line information, see: https://apps.cand.uscourts.gov/telhrg/ All counsel, members of the public and press please use the following dial-in information below to access the conference line: Dial In: 1-888-808-6929Access Code: 6064255The Court may be in session with proceedings in progress when you connect to the conference line. Therefore, mute your phone if possible and wait for the Court to address you before speaking on the line. For call clarity, parties shall NOT use speaker phone or earpieces for these calls, and where at all possible, parties shall use landlines.PLEASE NOTE: Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited. See General Order 58 at Paragraph III. (kkp, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/3/2023) |
Filing 41 Proposed Order re #40 Order on Motion to Appear by Telephone by Lifeforce Digital Inc.. (Burns, Manon) (Filed on 5/3/2023) |
Filing 40 ORDER by Judge Haywood S Gilliam, Jr granting #39 Motion to Appear by Telephone. (kkp, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/3/2023) |
Filing 39 MOTION to Appear by Telephone filed by Lifeforce Digital Inc.. (Burns, Manon) (Filed on 5/2/2023) |
Filing 38 Certification of ADR Session by Mediator Stefani E. Shanberg: I hereby certify that the parties in this matter held a Mediation session on April 20, 2023. The case did not settle. Further facilitated discussions are not expected. Mediation is complete. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (af, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/21/2023) |
Set/Reset Hearing Mediation Hearing set for 4/20/2023 09:30 AM Pacific, via Zoom. (af, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/23/2023) |
Filing 37 ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting #36 Revised Stipulated Protective Order. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/6/2023) Modified on 3/7/2023 to correct docket text(ndr, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 36 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Joint Explanation of Revised Stipulation and [Proposed] Protective Order filed by Threshold Enterprises Ltd.. (Chanin, Rachel) (Filed on 3/3/2023) |
Filing 35 ORDER by Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. DENYING Dkt. No. #34 Stipulation and Protective Order. The parties are ordered to submit a proposed Protective Order that tracks the Northern District of California's Model Stipulated Protective Order for Standard Litigation, or explain the basis for any requested deviations from the Model Order. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (hsglc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/1/2023) |
Filing 34 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER CORRECTION OF DOCKET #33 filed by Threshold Enterprises Ltd.. (Chanin, Rachel) (Filed on 2/28/2023) |
Filing 33 *Disregard. See dkt #34 for corrections*STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER filed by Threshold Enterprises Ltd.. (Chanin, Rachel) (Filed on 2/28/2023) Modified on 2/28/2023 (sfb, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 32 REPLY (re #16 MOTION to Dismiss ) filed byLifeforce Digital Inc.. (Spatz, George) (Filed on 1/31/2023) |
Filing 31 ADR Clerk's Notice Appointing Stefani Shanberg as Mediator. (af, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/25/2023) |
Filing 30 NOTICE of Appearance by Manon L Burns (Burns, Manon) (Filed on 1/24/2023) |
Filing 29 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #16 MOTION to Dismiss ) filed byThreshold Enterprises Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Agarwal, Monty) (Filed on 1/24/2023) |
Filing 28 CLERK'S NOTICE. Notice is hereby given that the initial case management conference, previously set for January 24, 2023, is continued to May 11, 2023, before Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr., at 2:00 p.m., in Courtroom 2, 4th Floor, 1301 Clay Street, Oakland, CA to be held along with the hearing on the #16 motion to dismiss. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/20/2023) |
Filing 27 NOTICE by Lifeforce Digital Inc. re #16 MOTION to Dismiss , 20 Clerk's Notice,,,, (Spatz, George) (Filed on 1/19/2023) |
Reset Hearing as to #16 MOTION to Dismiss, See Docket No. #27 : Motion Hearing set for 5/11/2023 02:00 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 2, 4th Floor before Judge Haywood S. Gilliam Jr. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/19/2023) |
Filing 26 ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting #15 Motion for Pro Hac Vice as to Spatz, George. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/18/2023) |
Filing 25 ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting #23 Stipulation Selecting Mediation. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/18/2023) |
CASE REFERRED to Mediation. (cmf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/18/2023) |
Filing 24 CLERK'S NOTICE TO COUNSEL RE DOCKET NO. #23 . All future filings should reflect the case number as 4:22-cv-06483-HSG as previously reminded in docket no. 20 . (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/17/2023) |
Filing 23 STIPULATION and Proposed Order selecting Mediation by Threshold Enterprises Ltd. filed by Threshold Enterprises Ltd.. (Agarwal, Monty) (Filed on 1/17/2023) |
Filing 22 JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT and Rule 26(f) Report filed by Threshold Enterprises Ltd.. (Agarwal, Monty) (Filed on 1/17/2023) |
Filing 21 CLERK'S NOTICE TO COUNSEL RE DOCKET NO. #15 . The address on the application does not match the address listed on the docket. Before the Court can render a decision on the application, you need to either update your address on the docket or re-file a new application with the correct address reflected on it. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/11/2023) |
Filing 20 CLERK'S NOTICE TO COUNSEL RE DOCKET NO. #16 . Notice is hereby given that counsel must re-notice not re-file the motion to dismiss. Hearing date of February 16, 2023, is vacated. The briefing schedule remains in effect. Counsel is directed to check the Court's scheduling notes before re-noticing the motion for a new hearing date. February 16th was not the Court's next available hearing date when this motion was e-filed. If counsel would like to request an earlier date, an administrative motion or a stipulation and proposed order should be e-filed after the motion is re-noticed. And if granted, the Court will advance the hearing date.. All future filings should reflect the case number as 4:22-cv-06483-HSG. The Judge's name is Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. In the future, the signature line of all proposed orders submitted should include Jr. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/11/2023) Modified on 1/11/2023 to correct docket no. to 16 (ndr, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 19 ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options (Orr, Matthew) (Filed on 1/10/2023) |
Filing 18 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Lifeforce Digital Inc. (Orr, Matthew) (Filed on 1/10/2023) |
Filing 17 Certificate of Interested Entities by Lifeforce Digital Inc. (Orr, Matthew) (Filed on 1/10/2023) |
Filing 16 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Lifeforce Digital Inc.. Motion Hearing set for 2/16/2023 02:00 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 2, 4th Floor before Judge Haywood S Gilliam Jr.. Responses due by 1/24/2023. Replies due by 1/31/2023. (Attachments: #1 Motion to Dismiss Memorandum of Points and Authorities, #2 Proposed Order)(Orr, Matthew) (Filed on 1/10/2023) |
Filing 15 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 317, receipt number ACANDC-17887051.) filed by Lifeforce Digital Inc.. (Spatz, George) (Filed on 1/10/2023) |
Filing 14 ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options (Agarwal, Monty) (Filed on 12/13/2022) |
Filing 13 STIPULATION Extending Defendant Lifeforce Digital Inc.'s Time to Respond to Complaint filed by Threshold Enterprises Ltd.. (Chanin, Rachel) (Filed on 11/15/2022) |
Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Threshold Enterprises Ltd.. Lifeforce Digital Inc. served on 10/26/2022, answer due 11/16/2022. (Chanin, Rachel) (Filed on 10/28/2022) |
#Electronic filing error. Incorrect event used. [err101]Please re-file in its entirety as Summons Returned Executed. Re: #11 Certificate of Service filed by Threshold Enterprises Ltd. (sfb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/28/2022) |
Filing 11 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Threshold Enterprises Ltd. (Chanin, Rachel) (Filed on 10/27/2022) |
Filing 10 CLERK'S NOTICE Re Docket No. #7 . Notice is hereby given that the initial case management conference, previously set for January 24th will be held telephonically on that date before Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr., at 2:00 p.m.The January 24th proceeding will be held by AT&T Conference Line. The parties are advised that in the event of an audio problem, counsel should be prepared to attend the hearing via Zoom conference at the Courts direction. The court circulates the following conference number to allow the equivalent of a public hearing by telephone.For conference line information, see: https://apps.cand.uscourts.gov/telhrg/ All counsel, members of the public and press please use the following dial-in information below to access the conference line: Dial In: 888-808-6929Access Code: 6064255The Court may be in session with proceedings in progress when you connect to the conference line. Therefore, mute your phone if possible and wait for the Court to address you before speaking on the line. For call clarity, parties shall NOT use speaker phone or earpieces for these calls, and where at all possible, parties shall use landlines. The parties are further advised to ensure that the Court can hear and understand them clearly before speaking at length.PLEASE NOTE: Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited. See General Order 58 at Paragraph III. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.)(ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/26/2022) |
Filing 9 REPORT on the filing or determination of an action regarding Trademark (cc: form mailed to register). (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/25/2022) |
Filing 8 Summons Issued as to Lifeforce Digital Inc.. (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/25/2022) |
Filing 7 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 1/17/2023. Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/24/2023 02:00 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 2, 4th Floor. (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/25/2022) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Rachel Lena Chanin (Chanin, Rachel) (Filed on 10/25/2022) |
Filing 5 Case assigned to Judge Haywood S Gilliam, Jr. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 11/8/2022. (bw, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/25/2022) |
Filing 4 Certificate of Interested Entities by Threshold Enterprises Ltd. identifying Other Affiliate Ira L Goldberg, Other Affiliate Source Naturals, Inc. for Threshold Enterprises Ltd.. (Agarwal, Monty) (Filed on 10/25/2022) |
Filing 3 REPORT on the filing or determination of an action regarding Trademarks (cc: form mailed to register). (Agarwal, Monty) (Filed on 10/25/2022) |
Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Agarwal, Monty) (Filed on 10/25/2022) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Lifeforce Digital Inc. ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACANDC-17661568.). Filed byThreshold Enterprises Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Agarwal, Monty) (Filed on 10/25/2022) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Threshold Enterprises Ltd. v. Lifeforce Digital Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Threshold Enterprises Ltd. | |
Represented By: | Monty Agarwal |
Represented By: | Rachel Lena Chanin |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Lifeforce Digital Inc. | |
Represented By: | Matthew Ryan Orr |
Represented By: | George R. Spatz |
Represented By: | Manon L. Burns |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.