Florence School District One v. Meta Platforms Inc et al
| Florence School District One |
| Meta Platforms Inc., Facebook Payments, Inc., Siculus Inc., Facebook Operations LLC, Instagram LLC, Snap Inc., Tiktok Inc., TikTok Ltd, TikTok LLC, Bytedance Ltd, ByteDance Inc., Google LLC and YouTube LLC |
| 4:2024cv00101 |
| January 5, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Transcript of Proceedings held on 01/26/2024, before Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. Court Reporter/Transcriber Stephen W. Franklin, telephone number (561)313-8439. Per General Order No. 59 and Judicial Conference policy, this transcript may be viewed only at the Clerk's Office public terminal or may be purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber until the deadline for the Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Any Notice of Intent to Request Redaction, if required, is due no later than 5 business days from date of this filing. (Re (566 in 4:22-md-03047-YGR) Transcript Order, (567 in 4:22-md-03047-YGR) Transcript Order, (572 in 4:22-md-03047-YGR) Transcript Order, (571 in 4:22-md-03047-YGR) Transcript Order ) Release of Transcript Restriction set for 5/6/2024. (Franklin, Stephen) (Filed on 2/5/2024) |
| Filing 7 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Peter H Kang: Discovery Hearing held on 1/25/2024. Total Time in Court: 3h 24m. Court Reporter: Ruth Levine Ekhaus. Plaintiff Attorney: Christopher Ayers, Lexi Hazam, Previn Warren, Emily Jeffcott, Thomas Huynh. Defendant Attorney: (Meta) Ashley Simonsen, Isaac Chaput, (Snap) Jonathan Blavin, (TikTok) Geoffrey Drake, Andrea Pierson, Amy Fiterman, (YouTube) Matt Donohue. (jaf, COURT STAFF) (Date Filed: 1/25/2024) Modified on 1/29/2024 (jlm, COURT STAFF). |
| MEMBER CASE OPENED: District of South Carolina, 4:23-cv-05229, Florence School District One v. Meta Platforms Inc et al., Opened in California Northern District as 4:24-cv-00101-YGR pursuant to Conditional Transfer Order CTO-25 cc: JPMDL (jlm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/5/2024) |
| Filing 6 Case transferred in from District of South Carolina; Case Number 4:23-cv-05229. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
| ***ERRONEOUS ENTRY; DOES NOT INCLUDE TRANSFERRED IN CASE NUMBER AND TRANSFERRING DISTRICT*** MEMBER CASE OPENED: MDL 3047, Florence School District One v. Meta Platforms Inc et al, Opened in California Northern District as 4:24-cv-00101-YGR cc: JPMDL (sfb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/5/2024) Modified on 1/17/2024 (jlm, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 5 Case transferred to Northern District of California per certified copy of Conditional Transfer Order Number CTO-25. The Transferring Clerk's Office hereby attests the record and the docket sheet available through CM/ECF to be the certified list. (gray) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (gray) |
| Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Florence School District One. (gray) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ASCDC-11383136), filed by Florence School District One. Service due by 1/17/2024. (gray) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
