Stamm v. King
Plaintiff: John Richard Stamm, II
Defendant: Michelle King and Acting Commissioner Leland Dudek
Interested Party: SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
Case Number: 4:2025cv00646
Filed: January 17, 2025
Court: U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Haywood S Gilliam
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 27, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 13, 2025 Filing 11 SSA Administrative Transcript Notice of Lodging Certified Administrative Record in Electronic Form by Leland Dudek. (Attachments: #1 Part 1, #2 Part 2, #3 Part 3, #4 Part 4, #5 Part 5, #6 Part 6, #7 Part 7, #8 Part 8)(Johann, Pamela) (Filed on 3/13/2025)
February 3, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Judge Haywood S Gilliam, Jr granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (kc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/3/2025)
January 31, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Haywood S Gilliam, Jr for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Robert M. Illman no longer assigned to case. Signed by Clerk on 01/31/2025. (mbc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/31/2025)
January 31, 2025 Filing 8 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (glm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/31/2025)
January 30, 2025 Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Michelle King.. (Highland, Erin) (Filed on 1/30/2025)
January 23, 2025 Filing 6 SOCIAL SECURITY PROCEDURAL ORDER: (far, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/23/2025)
January 22, 2025 Filing 5 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by John Richard Stamm, II.. (Lehrkind, Margaret) (Filed on 1/22/2025)
January 21, 2025 Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Robert M. Illman. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 2/4/2025. (as, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/21/2025)
January 21, 2025 Filing 3 Civil Cover Sheet by John Richard Stamm, II . (Lehrkind, Margaret) (Filed on 1/21/2025)
January 21, 2025 #Electronic filing error. Please refile Civil Cover Sheet. Use December 2024 form which can be downloaded from https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/. No judge assignment will be made until the document is e-filed. Submit your document using Civil Events > Other Filings > Other Documents > Civil Cover SheetPlease re-file in its entirety. Re: #1 Complaint filed by John Richard Stamm, II (mbc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/21/2025)
January 17, 2025 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by John Richard Stamm, II. (Lehrkind, Margaret) (Filed on 1/17/2025)
January 17, 2025 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security. Filed by John Richard Stamm, II. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Lehrkind, Margaret) (Filed on 1/17/2025)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Stamm v. King
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John Richard Stamm, II
Represented By: Margaret T. Lehrkind
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michelle King
Represented By: Erin Highland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Acting Commissioner Leland Dudek
Represented By: Pamela T. Johann
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?