Hoffer v. Microsoft Corporation et al
Case Number: 5:2001cv20731
Filed: August 1, 2001
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Jose Office
Presiding Judge: Richard Seeborg
Presiding Judge: James Ware
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 145 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 22, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 361 ORDER ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSING CASE; VACATING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE re 360 Joint Case Management Statement filed by Microsoft Corporation. the Mandate left no factual or legal issues for the Court to address, this case should be administratively closed. Accordingly, Clerk shall close this case. The case management conference scheduled for 10/27/2008 is VACATED. Signed by Judge James Ware on 10/22/2008. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/22/2008)
October 2, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 359 ORDER Setting Case Management Conference re 351 Clerks Letter Spreading Mandate, 350 USCA Judgment. Joint Case Management Conference statement due 10/17/2008. Case Management Conference set for 10/27/2008 10:00 AM in Courtroom 8, 4th Floor, San Jose before Hon. James Ware. Please see Order for further specifics. Signed by Judge James Ware on 10/2/2008. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/2/2008)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hoffer v. Microsoft Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?