Bolbol et al v. Ringling Brothers and Barnum and Bailey Circus et al
| 5:2004cv00082 |
| January 8, 2004 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Jose Office |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
533
ORDER Granting 532 Notice of Withdrawal of Counsel. Attorney Matthew Rutledge Schultz terminated. Signed by Judge James Ware on 3/15/2011. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/15/2011)
|
|
Filing
509
ORDER SETTING HEARING ON STIPULATED MODIFIED INJUNCTION; VACATING CASE MANAGEMENTCONFERENCE re 508 Case Management Statement, 507 Case Management Statement. The 9/14/2009 Case Management Conference is VACATED. The Court sets the following briefi ng schedule: Motions due by 10/9/2009, Opposition due 10/26/2009, Replies due 11/2/2009. Motion Hearing set for 11/16/2009 09:00 AM in Courtroom 8, 4th Floor, San Jose. Please see the Court's Order for further specifics. Signed by Judge James Ware on 9/9/2009. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/10/2009)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Bolbol et al v. Ringling Brothers and Barnum and Bailey Circus et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
