The United States of America, for the use and Benefit of Summers Group, Inc. v. Mid Valley Electric and Communications, Inc. et al
5:2004cv05458 |
December 27, 2004 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Jose Office |
Jeremy Fogel |
Howard R. Lloyd |
Miller Act |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1352 Miller Act |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 83 STIPULATION AND ORDER 82 for Dismissal of Entire Action, ***Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 11/16/11. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/16/2011) |
Filing 78 STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING TRIAL re 77 . Bench Trial set for 10/31/2011 09:00 AM before Hon. Jeremy Fogel. Pretrial Conference set for 10/14/2011 11:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 5th Floor, San Jose before Hon. Jeremy Fogel. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 5/13/11. (dlm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/19/2011) |
Filing 62 ORDER APPROVING 61 JOINT STATUS REPORT AND REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE. The Status Conference set for 7/10/2009 is CONTINUED to 8/14/2009 10:30 AM in Courtroom 3, 5th Floor, San Jose. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 7/1/2009. (jflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/2/2009) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: The United States of America, for the use and Benefit of Summers Group, Inc. v. Mid Valley Electric and Communications, Inc. et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.