Public Employees' Retirement System of Mississippi v. Mercury Interactive Corporation et al
5:2005cv05157 |
December 12, 2005 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Jose Office |
Jeremy Fogel |
Patricia V. Trumbull |
Stockholders Suits |
15 U.S.C. ยง 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ORDER (1)DIRECTING THE CLERK OF THE COURT TO FILE THE COMPLAINT OF MISSISSIPPI PERS AND VACATING HEARING DATE ON MISSISSIPPI PERS' MOTION TO INTERVENE; (2) CONSOLIDATING THE INSTANT ACTION WITH THE MISSISSIPPI PERS ACTION AND THREE OTHER RELATED SECURITIES FRAUD ACTIONS; (3)GRANTING IN PART MISSISSIPPI PERS' MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF TO CONTINUE THE HEARING ON THE MERCURY PENSION FUND GROUP'S MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT AS LEAD PLAINTFF; (4) CONSTRUING MISSISSIPPI PERS' MOTION TO INTERVENE AS A MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT AS LEAD PLAINTIFF; AND (5) SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE RE THE LEAD PLAINTIFF MOTIONS. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 12/8/05. (dlm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/22/2005) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Public Employees' Retirement System of Mississippi v. Mercury Interactive Corporation et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.