Public Employees' Retirement System of Mississippi v. Mercury Interactive Corporation et al
Case Number: 5:2005cv05157
Filed: December 12, 2005
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Jose Office
Presiding Judge: Jeremy Fogel
Presiding Judge: Patricia V. Trumbull
Nature of Suit: Stockholders Suits
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 22, 2005 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER (1)DIRECTING THE CLERK OF THE COURT TO FILE THE COMPLAINT OF MISSISSIPPI PERS AND VACATING HEARING DATE ON MISSISSIPPI PERS' MOTION TO INTERVENE; (2) CONSOLIDATING THE INSTANT ACTION WITH THE MISSISSIPPI PERS ACTION AND THREE OTHER RELATED SECURITIES FRAUD ACTIONS; (3)GRANTING IN PART MISSISSIPPI PERS' MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF TO CONTINUE THE HEARING ON THE MERCURY PENSION FUND GROUP'S MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT AS LEAD PLAINTFF; (4) CONSTRUING MISSISSIPPI PERS' MOTION TO INTERVENE AS A MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT AS LEAD PLAINTIFF; AND (5) SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE RE THE LEAD PLAINTIFF MOTIONS. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 12/8/05. (dlm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/22/2005)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Public Employees' Retirement System of Mississippi v. Mercury Interactive Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?