"In re Charles Newman Section 1983 Claims"
Case Number: 5:2006cv05993
Filed: September 27, 2006
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Jose Office
Presiding Judge: James Ware
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 30, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER Addressing Pending Motion re 17 MOTION for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis filed by Charles Newman, Motions terminated: 17 Motion for Leave to Appeal In Forma Pauperis. Signed by Judge James Ware on 9/30/2008. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/30/2008)
July 27, 2007 Opinion or Order Filing 7 AMENDED ORDER CONSOLIDATING CASES re 6 Order Consolidating Cases. The Consolidated case shall be entitled In re Charles Newman Section 1983 Claims and shall include the following cases: C 06-05993 JW, C 06-06288 JW, C 06-06740 JW, C 06-07241 JW, C 07-00518 JW, C 07-00905 JW, C 07-01329 JW, C 07-02374 JW , C 07-02810 JW . The consolidated case shall proceed under Case No. C 06-05993 JW. The clerk shall reinstate Case No. C 06-04005 JW. The clerk shall reopen Case No. C 06-05993 JW (PR). Cases associated. Case Flag removed. Signed by Judge James Ware on 7/27/2007. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/27/2007)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: "In re Charles Newman Section 1983 Claims"
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?