Nicander v. Law Offices of Laurence A. Hecker et al
Barbara Nicander |
Law Offices of Laurence A. Hecker, Attorney At Law, Laurence A. Hecker and Greg Chandler |
5:2007cv05838 |
November 16, 2007 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Jose Office |
Santa Clara |
Jeremy Fogel |
Howard R. Lloyd |
Other Statutory Actions |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 110 ORDER ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSING ACTION IN LIGHT OF BANKRUPTCY STAY. ***Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 3/28/2011. (jflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/28/2011) |
Filing 109 ORDER GRANTING 108 REQUEST TO CONTINUE JANUARY 14, 2011 CMC FOR 90 DAYS. The Case Management Conference set for 1/14/2011 is CONTINUED to 4/15/2011 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 3, 5th Floor, San Jose. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 1/13/2011. (jflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/13/2011) |
Filing 105 ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 10/12/2010. |
Filing 102 ORDER GRANTING 101 REQUEST TO CONTINUE JULY 16, 2010 CMC FOR 90 DAYS. The Case Management Conference set for 7/16/2010 is CONTINUED to 10/15/2010 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 3, 5th Floor, San Jose. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 7/12/2010. (jflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/12/2010) |
Filing 98 STIPULATION AND ORDER AMENDING COMPLAINT TO ADD DEFENDANT APM FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS, LLC, AND DISMISSING DEFENDANTS LAURENCE HECKER AND HARRY PARKER re 97 . Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 4/27/10. (dlm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/29/2010) |
Filing 96 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO AMEND PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT TO ADD A NEW PARTY, APM FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS, LLC re 93 . Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 4/8/10. (dlm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/15/2010) |
Filing 90 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd granting in part and denying in part 65 plaintiff's Motion to Compel. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/21/2009) |
Filing 89 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd granting in part and denying in part 73 and 74 defendants' Motions to Compel. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/18/2009) |
Filing 88 ORDER Vacating Motion Hearings on Discovery Motions. Motions 65 , 73 and 74 are deemed submitted without oral argument. Hearings set for 12/8/2009 are vacated. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 12/04/2009. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/4/2009) |
Filing 54 ORDER APPROVING 53 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE 9/11/09 CMC AND DISCOVERY DEADLINE. The Case Management Conference set for 9/11/2009 is CONTINUED to 9/25/2009 at 10:30 AM. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 8/18/2009. (jflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/19/2009) |
Filing 47 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER (MODIFIED BY THE COURT). Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 3/2/2009. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/2/2009) |
Filing 46 ORDER APPROVING 44 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE 2/27/09 CMC. The Case Management Conference set for 2/27/09 is CONTINUED to 3/27/2009 at 10:30 AM. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 2/23/09. (jflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/24/2009) |
Filing 40 ORDER APPROVING 39 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE 12/19/08 CMC. Case Management Conference set for 12/19/08 is CONTINUED to 1/16/2009 at 10:30 AM.. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 12/12/08. (jflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/12/2008) |
Filing 30 ORDER GRANTING re 29 MOTION to Continue Case Management Conference. Case Management Conference set for 9/26/2008 10:30 AM. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 9/18/08. (dlm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/18/2008) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.