Omnivision Technologies, Inc. v. Qualcomm Incorporated
Omnivision Technologies, Inc. |
Qualcomm Incorporated |
5:2008cv01036 |
February 21, 2008 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Trademark Office |
Santa Clara |
Richard Seeborg |
Plaintiff |
Federal Question |
15:1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act) |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 STIPULATION AND ORDER of dismissal re: 17 (rslc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/8/2009) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Omnivision Technologies, Inc. v. Qualcomm Incorporated | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Omnivision Technologies, Inc. | |
Represented By: | K, Joon Oh |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Qualcomm Incorporated | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.