Ashman v. Solectron Corporation et al
Plaintiff: William A Ashman
Defendant: Solectron Corporation and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Case Number: 5:2008cv01430
Filed: March 13, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: Civil Rights: Jobs Office
County: Santa Clara
Presiding Judge: Howard R. Lloyd
Presiding Judge: Howard R. Lloyd
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 16, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 141 ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 11/10/10. (dlm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/16/2010)
August 4, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 116 ORDER by Judge Jeremy Fogel granting in part and denying in part 96 Motion for Summary Judgment and denying 99 Motion to Strike. (jflc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/4/2010)
May 28, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 98 STIPULATION AND ORDER RESCHEDULING THE HEARING ON DEFENDANT SOLECTRON CORPORATION'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, ALTERNATIVLEY, MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND ADJUSTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE (approving 97 ). The Motion Hearing set for 6/25/2010 is CONTINUED to 7/2/2010 at 9:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 5th Floor, San Jose. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 5/28/2010. (jflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/28/2010)
June 12, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 93 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd (1) granting 45 plaintiff's Motion to Compel; and (2) granting in part 49 plaintiff's Motion for Sanctions. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/12/2009)
May 26, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 90 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 83 Selecting ADR Process, Case referred to Private ADR. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 5/21/09. (dlm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/26/2009)
December 1, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 37 ORDER by Judge Jeremy Fogel denying 19 Motion to Dismiss; granting 19 Motion to Compel Return of Improperly Obtained Documents; granting in part 19 Motion to Exclude Improperly Obtained Documents; and denying 19 Motion to Disqualify Counsel (jflc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/1/2008)
October 15, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER GRANTING re 24 Ex Parte Motion to Continue Deadline to Complete Early Neutral Evaluation. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 10/10/08. (dlm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/15/2008)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ashman v. Solectron Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: William A Ashman
Represented By: Stephen Robert Pappas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Solectron Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?