Contreras v. Pfizer, Inc. et al
Philip M Contreras |
Pfizer, Inc. and Pfizer Products, Inc. |
5:2009cv03405 |
July 24, 2009 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Jose Office |
Santa Clara |
Patricia V. Trumbull |
Patricia V. Trumbull |
Defendant |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 26 STIPULATION AND ORDER GRANTING 25 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Pfizer, Inc. The Clerk shall close this file. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 9/24/2012. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/24/2012) |
Filing 24 ORDER GRANTING 21 STIPULATION TO STAY ACTION. This action is STAYED in its entirety pending final resolution of the appeal in DEste v. Bayer (07-56577), Barnick v. Wyeth (07-56684), and Menes v. Roche (08-55286). The Case Management Conference scheduled for March 2, 2012, is VACATED. The Clerk shall administratively close this file. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 2/23/2012. (ejdlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/23/2012) |
Filing 18 STIPULATION AND ORDER STAYING ACTION AND CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE re 17 . Status Conference set for 2/24/2012 10:30 AM in Courtroom 3, 5th Floor, San Jose before Hon. Jeremy Fogel. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 8/16/11. (dlm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/17/2011) |
Filing 11 ORDER APPROVING 10 STIPULATION TO STAY ACTION. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 11/5/2009. (jflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/5/2009) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.