Rivera et al v. Rivera
| Adan Rivera, Reyes Barajas, Ignacio Morales, Juan Mendez, Luis Mendez, Rafael Mendez, Manuel Chavez, Manuel Valladolid, Guillermo Laureano Avila, Victor Hugo Vivanco, Enedino Castro, Marco Mata, Jose Mendoza, Jose Bocanegra, Daniel Arzate and Ariel Maya |
| Neftail Candelario Rivera |
| 5:2010cv01345 |
| March 30, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Jose Office |
| Patricia V. Trumbull |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
35
ORDER Granting in part and Denying in part 16 Motion for Default Judgment. The Clerk shall close the file. Signed by Judge Koh on 5/17/2011. (lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/17/2011)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER That Case Be Reassigned. Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on March 29, 2011. (psglc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/30/2011)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER Setting Deadline To Consent to Proceed before a Magistrate Judge or To Request Reassignment to a District Judge. Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on March 23, 2011. (psglc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/23/2011)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER Setting Deadline for Plaintiff to File Motion for Entry of Default Judgment and Scheduling Status Conference. Signed by Judge Patricia V. Trumbull on 10/28/10. (pvtlc1) (Filed on 10/28/2010)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
