Govan Brown & Associates Limited v. Google, Inc.
| Govan Brown & Associates Limited |
| Google, Inc. |
| 5:2010cv02704 |
| June 21, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Jose Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Patricia V. Trumbull |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 4, 2011. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART GOVAN BROWN'S EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR ORDER TO CONDUCT DISCOVERY PURSUANT TO 28 USC SECTION 1782 re 1 Complaint, filed by Govan Brown & Associates Limited. Signed by Judge Patricia V. Trumbull on August 6, 2010. (pvtlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/6/2010)
|
| Filing 4 Proof of Service re ( 2 ) (Proposed) Order Gratning Ex-Parte Application by Govan Brown & Associates Limited (bw, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/2/2010) |
| Filing 3 ADR SCHEDULING ORDER: Case Management Statement due by 9/7/2010. Case Management Conference set for 9/14/2010 02:00 PM in Courtroom 5, 4th Floor, San Jose. (Attachments: # 1 Judge Trumbull Standing Order for Civil Practice in Assigned Cases for all Purposes, # 2 Standing Order Regarding Case Management in Civil Cases for all San Jose Judges, # 3 Standing Orders for All Judges of the Northern California District Court) (bw, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/21/2010) |
| Filing 2 (Proposed) Order Granting Ex-Parte Application for an Order to Conduct Discovery for Use in a Foreign Legal Proceeding Under 28 U.S.C. § 1782 and for Request for an Expedited Ruling re 1 by Govan Brown & Associates Limited. (bw, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/21/2010) |
| CASE DESIGNATED for Electronic Filing. (bw, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/21/2010) Modified on 7/7/2010 (bw, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 1 Ex-Parte Application for an Order to Conduct Discovery for Use in a Foreign Legal Proceeding Under 28 U.S.C. § 1782 and for Request for an Expedited Ruling (NO PROCESS) against Google, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 350, receipt number 44611005321). Filed by Govan Brown & Associates Limited. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A to Ex-Parte Application, # 2 Exhibit Bt o Ex-Parte Application, # 3 Exhibit C to Ex-Parte Application, # 4 Exhibit D to Ex-Parte Application, # 5 Exhibit E to Ex-Parte Application, # 6 Exhibit F to Ex-Parte Application, # 7 Exhibit G to Ex-Parte Application, # 8 Civil Cover Sheet)(bw, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/17/2010) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Govan Brown & Associates Limited v. Google, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Govan Brown & Associates Limited | |
| Represented By: | Terry John Mollica |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Google, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
