Felix v. Mayberg et al
| Scott E. Felix |
| S. Mayberg, P. Hedge and P. Vasquez |
| 5:2010cv02823 |
| June 28, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Jose Office |
| Kern |
| Lucy H. Koh |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
51
ORDER by Judge Lucy H. Koh denying 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus;denying 44 Motion for Hearing (lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/16/2014)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER granting motion to dismiss as to claim 2 by Judge Lucy H. Koh granting 31 Motion to Dismiss (lhklc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/26/2013)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER VACATING HEARING; CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 8/02/2013. (lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/2/2013)
|
|
Filing
30
Order by Hon. Lucy H. Koh granting 29 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to the Order to Show Cause.(lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/5/2013)
|
|
Filing
26
Order by Hon. Lucy H. Koh granting 25 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re 25 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply Application for Extension of Time to File Response to Order to Show Cause.(lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/22/2013)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 1/11/11. (Attachments: # 1 certificate of mailing)(mpb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/11/2011)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
