Barrous et al v. BP P.L.C. et al
| Maria Barrous and Demetrois Barrous |
| BP P.L.C., BP Exploration and Oil, Inc., BP Corporation North America, Inc, ConocoPhillips Company and BP Products North America, Inc. |
| 5:2010cv02944 |
| July 6, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Jose Office |
| Santa Clara |
| Patricia V. Trumbull |
| Torts to Land |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
175
ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Lucy Koh on October 14, 2011. (jflc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/14/2011)
|
|
Filing
173
ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE. Signed by Judge Lucy Koh on October 13, 2011. (jflc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/13/2011)
|
|
Filing
168
ORDER Continuing Pre-Trial Conference re 167 Notice (Other) filed by Maria Barrous, Demetrois Barrous. Signed by Judge Lucy Koh on October 4, 2011. (jflc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/4/2011)
|
|
Filing
165
Order by Hon. Lucy H. Koh granting in part and denying in part 65 , 84 , 78 , and 84 , Motions for Partial Summary Judgment; Terminating 101 Motion to File Additional Evidence; Terminating 112 Objections to Reply Evidence.(lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/3/2011)
|
|
Filing
159
Order by Hon. Lucy H. Koh granting in part and denying in part 99 , 109 Motion to File Under Seal.(lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/30/2011)
|
|
Filing
87
Order by Hon. Lucy H. Koh granting, AS MODIFIED, 75 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re 65 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment, 78 MOTION for Summary Judgment, 70 MOTION for Summary Judgment, 84 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment As To Punitive Damages. (lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/3/2011)
|
|
Filing
61
ORDER Granting in Part and Denying in Part 60 Stipulation to Continue Discovery Deadlines. Signed by Judge Koh on 5/3/2011. (lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/3/2011)
|
|
Filing
59
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER re 42 Proposed Order filed by BP Corporation North America, Inc, BP Exploration and Oil, Inc., BP P.L.C., ConocoPhillips Company, BP Products North America, Inc. Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on April 19, 2011. (psglc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/20/2011)
|
|
Filing
58
ORDER GRANTING-IN-PART AND DENYING-IN-PART DEFENDANT CONOCOPHILLIPS COMPANY'S MOTION TO COMPEL; ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT CONOCOPHILLIPS COMPANY'S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS by Judge Paul S. Grewal granting in part and denying in part 43 Motion to Compel (psglc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/14/2011)
|
|
Filing
56
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 55 Continuing ADR Deadline. Signed by Judge Koh on 4/5/2011. (lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/5/2011)
|
|
Filing
41
STIPULATION AND ORDER Continuing Case Management Conference to May 18, 2011. re 40 . Further Case Management Conference set for 5/18/2011 02:00 PM in Courtroom 4, 5th Floor, San Jose. Signed by Judge Koh on 2/17/2011. (lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/17/2011)
|
|
Filing
39
STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING ADR COMPLETION DATE pursuant to 38 . Signed by Judge Koh on 1/31/2011. (lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/31/2011) Modified on 1/31/2011 (lhklc1, COURT STAFF).
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 15 MOTION to Dismiss and 16 MOTION to Strike renoticed as Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Koh on 10/13/2010. (lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/13/2010)
|
|
Filing
17
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO ANSWER re 11 . Signed by Judge Koh on 8/20/2010. (lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/20/2010)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
