Greenberg v. Ordonez et al
Betty Greenberg |
Kathy Ordonez, Joel R. Jung, Ugo DeBlasi, William G. Green, Richard H. Ayers, Jean-Luc Belingard, Gail K. Naughton, Wayne I. Roe, Peter Barton Hutt, Bennett M. Shapiro and Celera Corporation |
5:2010cv03029 |
July 9, 2010 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Jose Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Howard R. Lloyd |
James Ware |
Stockholders Suits |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 STIPULATION AND ORDER AS MODIFIED BY THE COURT Consolidating Actions and Related Matters re (6 Stipulation in 5:10-cv-02935-JW). The following actions are hereby related and consolidated for all purposes, including pre-trial proceedings and trial: Ka hn v. Ordonez, et al. No. C 10-02935 and Greenberg v. Ordonez, et al. No. C 10-03029. Every pleading filed in the consolidated action, or in any separate action included herein, shall bear the following caption: No. C 10-02935 JW, "In re Celera Corp. Derviative Ligiation" The files of the consolidated action shall be maintained in one file under Master File No. C 10-02935 JW. The Clerk shall close C 10-03029. Consolidated Complaint due by 10/15/2010. Joint Case Management Statement due by 11/5/2010. Case Management Conference set for 11/15/2010 10:00 AM in Courtroom 8, 4th Floor, San Jose. Please see Order for further specifics. Signed by Judge James Ware on 9/23/2010. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/23/2010) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.