Qualman v. Beacon Property Management, Inc et al
| Marcelle Qualman |
| Beacon Property Management, Inc and Mainstay Business Solutions |
| 5:2010cv03524 |
| August 11, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Jose Office |
| Santa Clara |
| Patricia V. Trumbull |
| Fair Labor Standards Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
31
STIPULATION AND ORDER GRANTING 30 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal with prejudice AS TO DEFENDANT MAINSTAY pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1). The Clerk shall close this file. Signed by Judge James Ware on 2/3/2011. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/3/2011)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER GRANTING VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AS TO DEFENDANT BEACON PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, INC. ONLY re 27 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal. Beacon Property Management, Inc terminated. Signed by Judge James Ware on 12/10/2010. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/10/2010)
|
|
Filing
26
STIPULATION AND ORDER Granting Third Stipulation To Extend Time For Defendant Beacon Property Management, Inc. To Respond To Complaint re 25 Stipulation. Response due 1/12/2011. Signed by Judge James Ware on 11/19/2010. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/19/2010)
|
|
Filing
23
STIPULATION AND ORDER Extending Time for Defendant Beacon Property Management, Inc. to Respond to Complaint by 11/19/2010 re 21 Stipulation. Signed by Judge James Ware on 10/19/2010. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/19/2010)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
