Merel v. Hedgpeth et al
||Jose Antonio Merel
||Anthony Hedgpeth, Matthew Cate and Edmund G. Brown
||November 9, 2010
||US District Court for the Northern District of California
||San Jose Office
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
||28 U.S.C. § 2254
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|September 26, 2012
JUDGMENT. For the reasons stated in the order denying the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, judgment is entered in favor of Respondent and against Petitioner.SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED. ***Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 9/25/2012. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/26/2012)
|June 24, 2011
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE TRAVERSE; DENYING MOTIONFOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL. The motion for an extension of time is GRANTED, such that Petitioner must file a traverse no later than July 11, 2011. Petitioner's motion f or appointment of counsel is DENIED. The interests of justice do not require appointment of counsel in the instant case. Should the circumstances change materially at a later stage of the litigation, the Court will reconsider this decision sua sponte. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 6/23/2011. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/24/2011)
|February 11, 2011
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. The clerk shall serve by certified mail a copy of this order and the petition and all attachments thereto on respondent and respondent's attorney, the Attorney General of the State of California. The clerk also shall serve a copy of this order on petitioner. Signed by Judge James Ware on 2/11/2011. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/11/2011)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?