Valdez et al v. City of Gonzales et al
| Jose Luis Valdez, Alicia T. Valdez, Juanita Ramirez Flores, Mizael Francisco Valdez Ramirez and Francesca Marie Valdez |
| City of Gonzales, Gonzales Police Department, Paul Miller, Peter Austen and Does 1-50 |
| 5:2010cv05112 |
| November 12, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Jose Office |
| Monterey |
| Lucy H. Koh |
| Howard R. Lloyd |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
27
ORDER re 26 Stipulation Dismissing Case with Prejudice by All Parties. Signed by Judge Koh on 10/7/11. (lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/7/2011)
|
|
Filing
21
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER re 19 (MODIFIED BY THE COURT). Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 3/14/2011. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/14/2011)
|
|
Filing
11
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 10 Allowing Plaintiff to File an Amended Complaint. Plaintiff shall file an Amended Complaint by January 17, 2011. Defendants' Motion for More Definite Statement 5 is DISMISSED AS MOOT. The Februry 23, 2011 Case Management Conference remains as set. Signed by Judge Koh on 12/15/2010. (lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/15/2010)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER re 5 SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT. Signed by Judge Koh on 11/23/2010. (lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/23/2010)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
