Ralink Technology Corp. v. Lantiq, Deutschland GmbH
Plaintiff: Ralink Technology Corp.
Defendant: Lantiq, Deutschland GmbH
Case Number: 5:2011cv01549
Filed: March 30, 2011
Court: U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Jose Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Edward J. Davila
Presiding Judge: Paul Singh Grewal
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 145
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 10, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 113 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER re 112 Stipulation filed by Ralink Technology Corp. Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on January 10, 2012. (psglc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/10/2012)
November 29, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 109 ORDER DENYING RALINK TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION'S EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE; ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF LANTIQ DEUTSCHLAN GMBH'S MOTION TO STRIKE by Judge Paul S. Grewal denying 91 Ex Parte Application 92 MOTION to Strike or Deny Ralink's Motion Styled "Ex Parte Application for an Order to Show Cause Re Contempt" and for Sanctions, 91 Ex Parte Application re 85 Order on Motion to Compel Ex Parte Application re 85 Order on Motion to Compel ; denying 92 Motion to Strike 92 MOTION to Strike or Deny Ralink's Motion Styled "Ex Parte Application for an Order to Show Cause Re Contempt" and for Sanctions, 91 Ex Parte Application re 85 Order on Motion to Compel Ex Parte Application re 85 Order on Motion to Compel (psglc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/29/2011)
October 6, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 96 ORDER Granting Motion to Substitution of Attorney. Motions terminated: 94 MOTION to Appoint Counsel. Attorney James R. Hannah and Lisa Kobialka terminated. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 10/6/2011. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/6/2011)
July 15, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 83 Order Granting 81 Motion for Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Scott Kolassa. Signed by Hon. Edward J. Davila on 7/15/2011.(ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/15/2011)
June 24, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 72 ORDER Granting Withdrawal of Counsel 63 Notice (Other). Attorney Lisa Koop; John S. Skilton; David L. Anstaett and Christopher G. Hanewicz terminated. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 6/24/2011. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/24/2011)
June 17, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 70 Order by Magistrate Judge Paul Singh Grewal denying 67 Motion to Shorten Time. (psglc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/17/2011)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ralink Technology Corp. v. Lantiq, Deutschland GmbH
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ralink Technology Corp.
Represented By: Christopher G. Hanewicz
Represented By: David L. Anstaett
Represented By: Chris Allen Hivick
Represented By: Sten Jensen
Represented By: Lissa Koop
Represented By: Steven J. Routh
Represented By: John S. Skilton
Represented By: William H. Wright
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lantiq, Deutschland GmbH
Represented By: Brittany S. Ogden
Represented By: J. Michael True
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?