McCloskey v. D & J Hillview LLC et al
Rosa McCloskey |
Cambridge Property Management, Secure Horizons USA, Inc, Individual Practice Association Medical Group of Santa Clara County, Inc, D & J Hillview LLC and Laboratory Corporation of America |
5:2011cv01823 |
April 14, 2011 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Jose Office |
Santa Clara |
Edward J. Davila |
Howard R. Lloyd |
Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 35 STIPULATION AND ORDER GRANTING DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to FRCP 4l(a)(1) re 34 Stipulation. The Clerk shall close this file. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 1/6/2012. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/6/2012) |
Filing 33 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE SETTLEMENT. Order to Show Cause Hearing set for 1/13/2012 09:00 AM. Joint Statement or Stipulated Dismissal due by 1/5/2012. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 11/29/2011. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/29/2011) |
Filing 30 ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE; SCHEDULING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. The Order to Show Cause issued August 30, 2011, is hereby DISCHARGED. Case Management Conference set for 12/9/2011 10:00 AM in Courtroom 1, 5th Floor, San Jose. Case Management Statement due by 12/2/2011. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 9/28/2011. (ejdlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/28/2011) |
Filing 28 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. The court hereby issues an order to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. If plaintiff does not, by September 27, 2011, either (1) demonstrate compliance with paragraphs 5 and 6 of General Order No. 56, or (2) demonstrate good cause in writing why this case should not be dismissed, the Court will dismiss the action with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). No hearing will be held on the order to show cause unless otherwise ordered by the Court.. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 9/13/2011. (ejdlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/13/2011) |
Filing 27 STIPULATION AND ORDER Granting Dismissal with Prejudice as to Defendants Secure Horizons USA, Inc., Individual Practice Association Medical Group of Santa Clara County re 26 Stipulation. Motions terminated: 21 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Secure Horizons USA, Inc. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 7/14/2011. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/14/2011) |
Filing 20 STIPULATION AND ORDER Granting Request Extending Time to Respond to Complaint re 19 Stipulation. Response due 7/6/2011 by Individual Practice Association Medical Group of Santa Clara County. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 6/24/2011. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/24/2011) |
Filing 17 STIPULATION AND ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT as to Defendant Laboratory Corporation of America re 15 Stipulation. Laboratory Corporation of America response due 6/29/2011. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 6/14/2011. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/14/2011) |
Filing 12 STIPULATION AND ORDER Granting Request for Extension of Time to File Response to Complaint re 11 Stipulation. Response due for Secure Horizons USA, Inc. by 6/27/2011. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 6/8/2011. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/8/2011) |
Filing 10 ORDER Extending Time to Respond to Complaint re 8 Stipulation. Individual Practice Association Medical Group of Santa Clara County, Inc. response due 6/21/2011. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 6/3/2011. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/3/2011) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.