Sullivan v. Aramark Uniform and Career Apparel, Inc et al
| Daniel Sullivan |
| Aramark Uniform and Career Apparel, Inc, Bill Pacheco, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 853, Michael Amaral, Rome Aloise and Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel, LLC |
| 5:2011cv02973 |
| June 16, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Jose Office |
| Santa Clara |
| Howard R. Lloyd |
| Labor/Management Relations |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
45
ORDER GRANTING 36 ARAMARK AND PACHECO'S MOTION TO DISMISS AND DENYING 38 THE UNION DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS AS MOOT. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 11/18/11. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/18/2011)
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER Re 40 Joint Stipulation to Continue the Case Management Conference. Case Management Conference is set for December 13, 2011 at 1:30 p.m. in Courtroom 2, Fifth Floor, 280 South 1st St., San Jose, CA. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 10/19/11. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/19/2011)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER GRANTING 9 Aramark and Pacheco's Motion to Dismiss. Sullivan shall file any amended complaint within 30 days from the date of this order. Signed by Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 8/3/2011. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/3/2011)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
