Boswell v. Apple, Inc. Featured Case
Plaintiff: Nicolette Boswell
Defendant: Apple, Inc. and Does 1 through 10
Case Number: 5:2011cv04558
Filed: September 16, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Jose Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Paul Singh Grewal
Presiding Judge: Lucy H. Koh
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 6, 2011. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 27, 2011 Filing 12 CLERKS NOTICE advising counsel of receipt of case (Nicolette Boswell -v- Apple, Inc., et al, 9:11-cv-80658) from the Southern District of Florida (OUR CASE NO. C11-04558) (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/27/2011)
September 16, 2011 Filing 11 Case transferred in from District of Florida Southern; Case Number 9:11-cv-80658. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received.
September 16, 2011 Filing 10 Certified CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-1) transferring case to the Northern District of California re: MDL 2250 for consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 USC 1407 and assigned to the Honorable Lucy H. Koh. (Signed by Jeffery N. Luthi). (gp)
July 11, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 9 STIPULATION AND ORDER STAYING CASE. This case is administratively CLOSED. All pending motions are denied as moot. Signed by Judge Kenneth A. Marra on 7/11/2011. (ir)
June 30, 2011 Filing 8 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Francis Augustine Zacherl, III on behalf of Apple, Inc. (Zacherl, Francis)
June 30, 2011 Filing 7 STIPULATION and [Proposed] Order to Stay Proceedings by Nicolette Boswell (Smith, Brian)
June 29, 2011 Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Nicolette Boswell. Apple, Inc. waiver sent on 6/10/2011, answer due 8/9/2011. (Smith, Brian)
June 13, 2011 Filing 5 Notice of Related Action by Apple, Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Proof of Service, # 2 Schedule of Related Actions)(jcy)
June 7, 2011 Filing 4 Order Requiring Counsel to Confer and File Joint Scheduling Report. Signed by Judge Kenneth A. Marra on 6/7/2011. (ir)
June 6, 2011 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Apple, Inc. (jcy)
June 3, 2011 Filing 2 Judge Assignment to Judge Kenneth A. Marra (jcy)
June 3, 2011 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Apple, Inc.. Filing fee $ 350.00 receipt number 113C-3810579, filed by Nicolette Boswell. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Summon(s), # 3 Exhibit Receipt of purchase)(Smith, Brian)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Boswell v. Apple, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nicolette Boswell
Represented By: Howard Weil Rubinstein
Represented By: Brian William Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Apple, Inc.
Represented By: Francis Augustine Zacherl, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 through 10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?