Tatum v. Buckley
||Irvin T. Tatum
||G. Lewis, A. Perez, P. Smith, D. Foston, J. Rush, B. Alkire and C. Buckley
||September 30, 2011
||US District Court for the Northern District of California
||San Jose Office
||Lucy H. Koh
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|November 21, 2013
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS; ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. Defendants' motion to dismiss (Docket No. 67) is GRANTED in part, and DENIED in part. All Eighth Amend ment claims against defendants Perez, Alkire, and Smith are DISMISSED, and all equal protection claims against all defendants are also DISMISSED. Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Docket No. 67) is GRANTED in favor of Buckley and Rush. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 11/21/2013. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/21/2013)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?