Tamayo v. Cordevalle Golf Club,LLC
Ana Tamayo |
Cordevalle Golf Club LLC and Cordevalle, L.P. |
5:2011cv05492 |
November 14, 2011 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Jose Office |
Santa Clara |
Edward J. Davila |
Howard R. Lloyd |
Employment |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 15, 2011. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 CLERK'S NOTICE of Impending Reassignment to U.S. District Judge (pmc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/15/2011) |
Filing 5 Declination to Proceed Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge by Ana Tamayo. (Dawson, Gates) (Filed on 11/15/2011) |
Filing 4 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Ana Tamayo. (Dawson, Gates) (Filed on 11/15/2011) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Ana Tamayo Marc A Eisenhart (Dawson, Gates) (Filed on 11/15/2011) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (NO PROCESS) jury demand; from Superior Court of California, Santa Clara County. Their case number is 111CV208862. (Filing fee $350 receipt number 54611010746). Filed by Ana Tamayo. (OVERSIZED DOCUMENT) (bw, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/14/2011) |
CASE DESIGNATED for Electronic Filing. (bw, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/14/2011) |
Filing 2 ADR SCHEDULING ORDER: Case Management Statement due by 1/3/2011. Case Management Conference set for 1/10/2011 01:30 PM in Courtroom 2, 5th Floor, San Jose. (bw, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/4/2011) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.