Pipkin et al v. Carrier IQ, Inc et al Featured Case
Plaintiff: Daniel Pipkin and Chad Ulrich
Defendant: Carrier IQ, Inc, Samsung Electronics America, Inc., HTC America, Inc. and Samsung Telecommunications America, Inc.
Case Number: 5:2011cv05820
Filed: December 2, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Jose Office
County: Santa Clara
Presiding Judge: Howard R. Lloyd
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 5, 2011. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 5, 2011 Filing 4 Declination to Proceed Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge by Daniel Pipkin. (Warshaw, Daniel) (Filed on 12/5/2011)
December 2, 2011 Filing 1 Allleged Class Action Complaint (Summons Issued); jury demand; against Carrier IQ, Inc, HTC America, Inc., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Telecommunications America, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 350, receipt number 54611010840). Filed by Chad Ulrich, Daniel Pipkin. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet) (bw, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/2/2011)
December 2, 2011 CASE DESIGNATED for Electronic Filing. (bw, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/2/2011)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pipkin et al v. Carrier IQ, Inc et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Daniel Pipkin
Represented By: Thomas Kay Boardman
Represented By: Clifford H. Pearson
Represented By: Bobby Pouya
Represented By: Aaron M. Sheanin
Represented By: Bruce Lee Simon
Represented By: Daniel L. Warshaw
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Chad Ulrich
Represented By: Thomas Kay Boardman
Represented By: Clifford H. Pearson
Represented By: Bobby Pouya
Represented By: Aaron M. Sheanin
Represented By: Bruce Lee Simon
Represented By: Daniel L. Warshaw
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carrier IQ, Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: HTC America, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Samsung Telecommunications America, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?