Romantic Tours, Inc. v. Anastasia International, Inc.
Plaintiff: Romantic Tours, Inc.
Defendant: Anastasia International, Inc.
Case Number: 5:2011mc80267
Filed: November 2, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Jose Office
Presiding Judge: Lucy H. Koh
Presiding Judge: Howard R. Lloyd
Nature of Suit: Other

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 3, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER Denying 6 Joint Request to Stay Case. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 1/3/12. (lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/3/2012)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Romantic Tours, Inc. v. Anastasia International, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Romantic Tours, Inc.
Represented By: Siavash Daniel Rashtian
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Anastasia International, Inc.
Represented By: Craig B. Bailey
Represented By: Scott Robert Hansen
Represented By: James Juo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?