Snyder et al v. Apple Inc. Featured Case
Plaintiff: Erin Snyder and Zachary Richardet
Defendant: Apple Inc
Case Number: 5:2012cv00163
Filed: January 18, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Jose Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Paul Singh Grewal
Presiding Judge: Lucy H. Koh
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 18, 2012. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 18, 2012 Filing 17 Case transferred in from District of Missouri Eastern; Case Number 4:11-cv-00784. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received.
January 11, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER OF MDL TRANSFER to: Northern District of California. Case transferred via CM/ECF extraction. (DLB)
December 14, 2011 Filing 15 TRANSFER ORDER regarding multidistrict litigation by Clerk of the Panel - IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, these actions are transferred to the Northern District of California and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Lucy H. Koh for inclusion in the coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings occurring there in this docket. (DLB)
December 9, 2011 Filing 14 Docket Text ORDER: Re: 13 MOTION for Extension of: Unopposed Motion to Extend Time To Respond to the Amended Complaint by Defendant Apple, Inc.. (Rogers, John) filed by Apple, Inc. - GRANTED Signed by Honorable Rodney W. Sippel on 12/9/11. (LAH)
December 8, 2011 Filing 13 MOTION for Extension of: Unopposed Motion to Extend Time To Respond to the Amended Complaint by Defendant Apple, Inc.. (Rogers, John)
October 18, 2011 Filing 12 FIRST AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT against defendant Apple, Inc. filed by plaintiffs Erin Snyder, Zachary Richardet.(Montroy, Christian)
September 13, 2011 Filing 11 Docket Text ORDER: Re: 10 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer Due to Issuance of Conditional Transfer Order by Judicial Panel For Multidistrict Litigation by Defendant Apple, Inc.. (Rogers, John) filed by Apple, Inc. ; ORDERED GRANTED. Signed by Honorable Rodney W. Sippel on 9/13/11. (LGK)
September 12, 2011 Filing 10 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer Due to Issuance of Conditional Transfer Order by Judicial Panel For Multidistrict Litigation by Defendant Apple, Inc.. (Rogers, John)
August 23, 2011 Filing 9 Docket Text ORDER: Re: 8 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer (Unopposed) by Defendant Apple, Inc.. (Rogers, John) filed by Apple, Inc. ; ORDERED GRANTED. Signed by Honorable Rodney W. Sippel on 8/23/11. (ARL)
August 22, 2011 Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer (Unopposed) by Defendant Apple, Inc.. (Rogers, John)
August 10, 2011 Filing 7 Docket Text ORDER: Re: 6 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Judy L. Cates (Filing fee $100 receipt number 0865-2878069)Yes or No - No, by Plaintiffs Zachary Richardet, Erin Snyder. (Cates, Judy) filed by Zachary Richardet, Erin Snyder ; ORDERED GRANTED. Signed by Honorable Rodney W. Sippel on 8/10/11. (LGK)
August 9, 2011 Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Judy L. Cates (Filing fee $100 receipt number 0865-2878069)Yes or No - No, by Plaintiffs Zachary Richardet, Erin Snyder. (Cates, Judy)
July 6, 2011 Filing 5 ENTRY of Appearance by John W. Rogers for Defendant Apple, Inc.. (Rogers, John)
July 6, 2011 Filing 4 Docket Text ORDER: STIPULATION # 3 Extending Apple Inc.'s Time to Respond To Plaintiff's Complaint; ORDERED GRANTED. Signed by Honorable Rodney W. Sippel on 7/6/11. (RAK)
July 5, 2011 Filing 3 STIPULATION Extending Apple Inc.'s Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by Defendant Apple, Inc.. (Rogers, John)
July 5, 2011 Filing 2 DISCLOSURE OF CORPORATION INTERESTS CERTIFICATE by Defendant Apple, Inc.. Parent companies: None, Subsidiaries: None, Publicly held company: None,. (Rogers, John)
May 4, 2011 Case Opening Notification - Waivers issued: 1, Judge Assigned: Judge Rodney W. Sippel. (BAK)
May 3, 2011 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant APPLE INC with receipt number 0865-2738744, in the amount of $350 Jury Demand,, filed by Erin Snyder, ZACHARY RICHARDET. (Attachments: # 1 Original Filing Form, # 2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Montroy, Christian) (Additional attachment(s) added on 5/4/2011: # 3 Waiver of Service) (BAK).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Snyder et al v. Apple Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Erin Snyder
Represented By: Judy L. Cates
Represented By: Christian Gerhard Montroy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Zachary Richardet
Represented By: Judy L. Cates
Represented By: Christian Gerhard Montroy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Apple Inc
Represented By: John W. Rogers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?