Beasley v. Lake County Sheriff's Office et al
| Robby Alan Beasley |
| Lake County Superior Court Judge and Lake County Sheriff's Office |
| 5:2012cv01640 |
| April 2, 2012 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Jose Office |
| Lake |
| Edward J. Davila |
| PSLC HHL |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
29
ORDER DISMISSING THE COMPLAINT WITH LEAVE TO AMEND by Judge William H. Orrick granting 22 Motion to Dismiss and 25 Motion to Dismiss. The complaint is DISMISSED with leave to amend. Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint on or before November 15, 2013. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/7/2013)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER OF SERVICE; DIRECTING DEFENDANTS TO FILE DISPSOITIVE MOTION OR NOTICE REGARDING SUCH MOTION; INSTRUCTIONS TO CLERK. The Clerk of the Court shall mail a Notice of Lawsuit and Request for Waiver of Service of Summons, two copies of the Waiver of Service of Summons, a copy of the amended complaint, (Docket No. 9), all attachments thereto, and a copy of this order upon Defendants Lyle Thomas, Tye Hockett, Chad Holland, Matt Gibson, J. Pfann and E. Porter at the Lake County Sheriff's Offic e, (P.O. Box 489, Lakeport, CA 95453). The Clerk shall also mail a copy of this Order to Plaintiff. The Clerk shall terminate Lake County Sheriff's Office and Lake County Superior Court Judge as parties to this action as Plaintiff has not named them as defendants in his amended complaint. Defendants will not be required to serve and file an answer before fifty-six (56) days from the day on which the request for waiver was sent. If service is waived after the date provided in the Notice but before Defendants have been personally served, the Answer shall be due fifty-six (56) days from the date on which the request for waiver was sent or twenty-one (21) days from the date the waiver form is filed, whichever is later. No later than fifty -six (56) days from the date of this order, Defendants shall file a motion for summary judgment or other dispositive motion with respect to the claims in the amended complaint found to be cognizable above. Dispositive Motion due by 11/29/2012. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 10/2/2012. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/4/2012) Modified text on 10/4/2012 (ecg, COURT STAFF).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
