Solis v. Louis & Riparetti, Inc et al
| Hilda Solis |
| Louis & Riparetti, Inc, Darrel Louis and Louis & Riparetti, Inc Retirement Plan |
| 5:2012cv01770 |
| April 10, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Jose Office |
| Santa Clara |
| Howard R. Lloyd |
| Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1001 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
51
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 50 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Re: Extension of Fact Discovery Cutoff filed by Seth D. Harris. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on February 7, 2014. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/7/2014)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER FOR JUNE 17, 2013 SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE. Settlement Conference set for 6/17/2013 09:00 AM in Courtroom F, 15th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 5/31/2013. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/31/2013)
|
|
Filing
30
CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER. ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge for Settlement. Further Case Management Conference set for 5/2/2013 10:00 AM;Pretrial Conference set for 10/17/2013 10:00 AM; Jury Selection set for 10/28/2013 09:00 AM; Jury Trial set for 10/28/2013 09:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Richard Seeborg. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 9/13/12. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/13/2012)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
