Ivie v. Kraft Foods Global, Inc. et al
| Susan Ivie |
| Kraft Foods Global, Inc. and Cadbury Adams USA, LLC |
| 5:2012cv02554 |
| May 17, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Jose Office |
| Santa Clara |
| Paul Singh Grewal |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
97
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE. Show Cause Response due by 10/1/2020. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on September 24, 2020. (mllS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/24/2020)
|
|
Filing
81
STIPULATION AND ORDER 80 Modifying Briefing Schedule and Hearing Date on Plaintiff's Motion for Class Certification. Motion Hearing set for 3/25/2016 09:00 AM in Courtroom 6, 4th Floor, San Jose before Hon. Ronald M. Whyte. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 3/30/15. (jgS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/30/2015)
|
|
Filing
79
ORDER by Judge Ronald M Whyte denying 77 Motion for Reconsideration of dismissal of unjust enrichment claim 49 (rmwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/14/2015)
|
|
Filing
66
ORDER amending signature date on Order 65 (rmwlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/28/2013)
|
|
Filing
62
ORDER 58 Continuing Hearing Date and Case Management Conference and Setting Briefing Scheule for Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint. Set/Reset Deadlines as to 56 MOTION to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint. M otion Hearing set for 6/28/2013 09:00 AM in Courtroom 6, 4th Floor, San Jose before Hon. Ronald M. Whyte. Case Management Conference set for 6/28/2013 10:30 AM in Courtroom 6, 4th Floor, San Jose. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 6/3/13. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/3/2013)
|
|
Filing
55
ORDER 54 Continuing April 19, 2013 Case Management Conference to June 14, 2013. Case Management Conference set for 6/14/2013 10:30 AM in Courtroom 6, 4th Floor, San Jose. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 4/17/13. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/17/2013)
|
|
Filing
49
Order by Hon. Ronald M. Whyte granting in part and denying in part 31 Motion to Dismiss(rmwlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/25/2013)
|
|
Filing
43
STIPULATION AND ORDER 42 Modifying Date for Case Management Conference. Case Management Conference set for 2/8/2013 10:30 AM in Courtroom 6, 4th Floor, San Jose. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 1/9/13. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/9/2013)
|
|
Filing
37
STIPULATION AND ORDER 35 Modifying Briefing Schedule and Hearing Date on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint. Set/Reset Deadlines as to 31 MOTION to Dismiss . Motion Hearing set for 2/8/2013 09:00 AM in Courtroom 6, 4th Floor, San Jose before Hon. Ronald M. Whyte. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 12/21/12. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/21/2012)
|
|
Filing
27
STIPULATION AND ORDER 26 Setting Schedule and Page Limits for Defendants' Anticpated Motion to Dismiss and Realted Briefing: Motion Hearing set for 1/11/2013 09:00 AM in Courtroom 6, 4th Floor, San Jose before Hon. Ronald M. Whyte. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 9/27/12. (jgS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/27/2012)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER 20 Continuing 9/7/2012 Case Management Conference to 11/30/2012: Case Management Conference set for 11/30/2012 10:30 AM in Courtroom 6, 4th Floor, San Jose. Joint Case Management Statement due 11/21/2012. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 9/5/12. (jgS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/5/2012)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
