Technology Properties Limited LLC et al v. LG Electroncis, Inc. et al
| Technology Properties Limited LLC, Phoenix Digital Solutions LLC and Patriot Scientific Corporation |
| LG Electroncis, Inc. and LG Electroncis U.S.A., Inc |
| 5:2012cv03880 |
| July 24, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Santa Clara |
| Paul Singh Grewal |
| Patent |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1338 Patent Infringement |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
104
ORDER GRANTING-IN-PART MOTIONS TO STRIKE AND DENYING MOTIONS TO COMPEL by Judge Paul S. Grewal granting-in-part 80 ( 97 ); denying 81 . (psglc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/11/2015)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER RELATING CASES Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on October 15, 2014. (psglc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/15/2014)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER, Motions terminated: 28 MOTION to Continue Initial Case Management Conference filed by LG Electroncis, Inc., LG Electroncis U.S.A., Inc. Initial Case Management Conference set for 10/10/14 is continued to 12/12/2014 02:30 PM in Courtroom 10, 19th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 10/6/14. (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/6/2014)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER OF REFERRAL FOR PURPOSES OF DETERMINING RELATIONSHIP. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 9/24/14. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/24/2014)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
