Travelers Property Casualty Company of America v. Taylor Woodrow Homes, Inc. et al
| Travelers Property Casualty Company of America |
| Taylor Woodrow Homes, Inc. and Does 1 through 10, inclusive |
| 5:2012cv04204 |
| August 9, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Jose Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Howard R. Lloyd |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
121
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE SETTLEMENT. Joint Statement or Stipulated Dismissal due by 12/5/2014. Order to Show Cause Hearing set for 12/12/2014 09:00 AM in Courtroom 4, 5th Floor, San Jose before Hon. Edward J. Davila. All other pretrial deadlines an d hearing dates are VACATED and any pending motions are TERMINATED. Failure to comply with any part of this Order will be deemed sufficient grounds to dismiss the action. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 9/29/2014. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/29/2014)
|
|
Filing
119
ORDER Granting 118 Stipulation of Dismissal of Arch Insurance Company filed by Travelers Property Casualty Company of America. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 8/12/2014. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/12/2014)
|
|
Filing
108
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd re 96 Discovery Dispute Joint Report No. 1. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/28/2014)
|
|
Filing
107
PRETRIAL ORDER. The Preliminary Pretrial Conference is VACATED and the parties are ordered to comply with the following schedule. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED this case is referred to Magistrate Judge Paul S. Grewal for a settlement conference to occur no later than 90 days from the date this order is filed. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that each party is limited to one Motion for Summary Judgment. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that dates and deadlines for the anticipated bench trial will be scheduled at the Final Pretrial Conference. Final Pretrial Conference set for 10/31/2014 09:00 AM in Courtroom 4, 5th Floor, San Jose. Jury Selection set for 11/17/2014 09:00 AM in Courtroom 4, 5th Floor, San Jose before Hon. Edward J. Davila. Jury Trial set for 11/18-11/25/14. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 2/26/2014. (ejdlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/26/2014)
|
|
Filing
86
ORDER CONTINUING PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL CONFERENCE. Having reviewed the parties Joint Preliminary Pretrial Conference Statement, the court finds a Preliminary Pretrial Conference unnecessary at this time and accordinglyCONTINUES the conference unti l February 28, 2014. The parties shall file their Joint Preliminary Pretrial Conference Statement by no later than February 18, 2014. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall meet and confer in order to reach an agreement on an ADR process within 10 days of the issuance of this Order. Within that same timeframe, the parties shall either (1) file the form entitled "Stipulation and (Proposed) Order Selecting ADR Process" if an agreement is reached, or (2) file the form entitled " ;Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference." Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 10/4/2013. ***10/11/2013 PTC Deadlines terminated. Motions terminated: 84 MOTION to Appear by Telephone at Preliminary Pretrial Conference on October 11, 2013 filed by Arch Insurance Group, 85 MOTION to Appear by Telephone at Pretrial Conference on 10/11/13 filed by American Safety Indemnity Company, 83 MOTION to Appear by Telephone at the Preliminary Pretrial Conference on October 11, 2013 filed by Taylor Morrison Services, Inc., Taylor Morrision of California LLC.(ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/4/2013)
|
|
Filing
75
ORDER GRANTING 74 Stipulation to Voluntarily Dismiss Defendants Arch Specialty Insurance Company and United Specialty Insurance Company FRCP Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) filed by Travelers Property Casualty Company of America. Arch Specialty Insurance Company (a Nebraska corporation) and United Specialty Insurance Company (a Delaware corporation) terminated. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 7/25/2013. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/25/2013)
|
|
Filing
65
ORDER granting 58 Motion for Leave to File. Travelers' Motion for Leave to File a Second Amended Complaint is GRANTED. Travelers shall file its Second Amended Complaint as a separate docket entry on PACER/ECF no later than June 14, 2013. B ecause Travelers' Second Amended Complaint will supersede the First Amended Complaint, Taylor Morrison's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, Dkt. No. 53, is terminated without prejudice. Taylor Morrison may file an appropriate motion as to the Second Amended Complaint by no later than November 1, 2013. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 5/30/13. (ejdlc4S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/30/2013) Modified text on 5/30/2013 (ecg, COURT STAFF).
|
|
Filing
62
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 60 Ex Parte Application re 53 MOTION for Summary Judgment to Continue Hearing Date filed by Travelers Property Casualty Company of America. Set/Reset Deadlines as to 53 MOTION for Summary Judgment: Responses due by 7/12/2013. Replies due by 7/26/2013. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 4/18/2013. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/19/2013)
|
|
Filing
24
STIPULATION AND ORDER Extending Time to Respond to the First Amended Complaint re 22 Stipulation filed by First Specialty Insurance Corporation. Response due 1/14/2013. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 12/20/2012. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/20/2012)
|
|
Filing
16
Order Granting 13 Ex Parte Application to Continue Case Management Conference. Signed by Hon. Edward J. Davila on 11/27/2012.(ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/27/2012)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
