Pope v. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Mark Duane Pope
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Case Number:
5:2012cv05503
Filed:
October 25, 2012
Court:
California Northern District Court
Office:
San Jose Office
County:
Santa Clara
Presiding Judge:
Ronald M. Whyte
Nature of Suit:
Social Security: RSI Tax Suits
Cause of Action:
42:405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Jury Demanded By:
None
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Date Filed | # | Document Text |
|---|---|---|
| June 30, 2014 | 19 |
ORDER by Judge Ronald M. Whyte granting 12 , 16 Motion for Remand; denying 17 Motion for Summary Judgment (rmwlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/30/2014)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Pope v. Astrue | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Mark Duane Pope | |
| Represented By: | Lisa Susan Douglass |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Michael J. Astrue | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.