Mortimer v. Wells Fargo Bank National Association
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank National Association
Plaintiff:
Mark Mortimer
Case Number:
5:2013cv01956
Filed:
April 29, 2013
Court:
California Northern District Court
Office:
San Jose Office
County:
Alameda
Presiding Judge:
Paul Singh Grewal
Nature of Suit:
Consumer Credit
Cause of Action:
28:1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporting Act
Jury Demanded By:
Defendant
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Mortimer v. Wells Fargo Bank National Association | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Wells Fargo Bank National Association | |
| Represented By: | Alisa Alexandra Givental |
| Represented By: | Scott J. Hyman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Mark Mortimer | |
| Represented By: | Scott Joseph Sagaria |
| Represented By: | Jarrett Stanton Osborne-Revis |
| Represented By: | Elliot Wayne Gale |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.